Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep;57(5):581-587.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.001. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Painless colonoscopy: fact or fiction?

Affiliations
Review

Painless colonoscopy: fact or fiction?

Pieter Sinonquel et al. Clin Endosc. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Although colonoscopy is a routinely performed procedure, it is not devoid of challenges, such as the potential for perforation and considerable patient discomfort, leading to patients postponing the procedure with several healthcare risks. This review delves into preprocedural and procedural solutions, and emerging technologies aimed at addressing the drawbacks of colonoscopies. Insufflation and sedation techniques, together with various other methods, have been explored to increase patient satisfaction, and thereby, the quality of endoscopy. Recent advances in this field include the prevention of loop formation, encompassing the use of variable-stiffness endoscopes, computer-guided scopes, magnetic endoscopic imaging, robotics, and capsule endoscopy. An autonomous endoscope that relies on self-propulsion to completely avoid looping is a potentially groundbreaking technology for the next generation of endoscopes. Nevertheless, critical techniques need to be refined to ensure the development of effective and efficient endoscopes.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Endoscopy; Patient comfort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Raf Bisschops is currently serving as an associate editor in Clinical Endoscopy; however, he was not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. Raf Bisschops received speaker’s fees, consultancy, and research support from Pentax, Fujifilm, and Medtronic. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023;72:338–344. - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Flugelman AA, Stein N, Segol O, et al. Delayed colonoscopy following a positive fecal test result and cancer mortality. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019;3:pkz024. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zorzi M, Battagello J, Selby K, et al. Non-compliance with colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test doubles the risk of dying from colorectal cancer. Gut. 2022;71:561–567. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gingold-Belfer R, Leibovitzh H, Boltin D, et al. The compliance rate for the second diagnostic evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:424–448. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources