Artificial intelligence and nonoperating room anesthesia
- PMID: 38934202
- DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001388
Artificial intelligence and nonoperating room anesthesia
Abstract
Purpose of review: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) represents a timely and significant advancement. As the demand for NORA services expands, the application of AI is poised to improve patient selection, perioperative care, and anesthesia delivery. This review examines AI's growing impact on NORA and how it can optimize our clinical practice in the near future.
Recent findings: AI has already improved various aspects of anesthesia, including preoperative assessment, intraoperative management, and postoperative care. Studies highlight AI's role in patient risk stratification, real-time decision support, and predictive modeling for patient outcomes. Notably, AI applications can be used to target patients at risk of complications, alert clinicians to the upcoming occurrence of an intraoperative adverse event such as hypotension or hypoxemia, or predict their tolerance of anesthesia after the procedure. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including ethical considerations, algorithmic bias, data security, and the need for transparent decision-making processes within AI systems.
Summary: The findings underscore the substantial benefits of AI in NORA, which include improved safety, efficiency, and personalized care. AI's predictive capabilities in assessing hypoxemia risk and other perioperative events, have demonstrated potential to exceed human prognostic accuracy. The implications of these findings advocate for a careful yet progressive adoption of AI in clinical practice, encouraging the development of robust ethical guidelines, continual professional training, and comprehensive data management strategies. Furthermore, AI's role in anesthesia underscores the need for multidisciplinary research to address the limitations and fully leverage AI's capabilities for patient-centered anesthesia care.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Nagrebetsky A, Gabriel RA, Dutton RP, Urman RD. Growth of nonoperating room anesthesia care in the United States: a contemporary trends analysis. Anesth Analg 2017; 124:1261–1267.
-
- Woodward ZG, Urman RD, Domino KB. Safety of non-operating room anesthesia: a closed claims update. Anesthesiol Clin 2017; 35:569–581.
-
- Pardo E, Camus M, Verdonk F. Anesthesia for digestive tract endoscopy. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2022; 35:528–535.
-
- Tasdogan AM. Knowledge, attitudes and perspectives of anesthesiologists on artificial intelligence. EJMI. 2020. Available at: https://www.ejmi.org/10.14744/ejmi.2020.54709/ .
-
- Henckert D, Malorgio A, Schweiger G, et al. Attitudes of anesthesiologists toward artificial intelligence in anesthesia: a multicenter, mixed qualitative–quantitative study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:2096.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
