Long-term duration and safety of Radiesse (+) for the treatment of jawline
- PMID: 38934231
- DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16436
Long-term duration and safety of Radiesse (+) for the treatment of jawline
Abstract
Background: Calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA)-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)+ has unique properties that make it optimal for lifting, contouring, and defining the jawline. This long-term follow-up of a randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded trial reports efficacy and safety of CaHA-CMC(+) through 48 and up to 60 weeks post-treatment.
Methods: Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to the treatment or the control/delayed treatment group to receive CaHA-CMC(+) injections in both jawlines. While touch-ups were permitted 4 weeks post-treatment for both groups, only the treatment group was eligible for optional retreatment after 48 weeks. The primary outcome was ≥1-point improvement on both jawlines on the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS); secondary endpoints included the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) among others. Post hoc analysis included pooling up to 48-week data from the combined treatment and control/delayed groups and 60-week data for the treatment group.
Results: Overall, 175 received treatment. MJAS responder rates were 77.9%, 78.7%, and 62.9% at 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-treatment, respectively. Responder rate on the MJAS at 60 weeks was 74.6% for those who received retreatment and 43.5% for those patients who received only the initial and touchup treatments. SGAIS scores demonstrated 93.4%, 85.6%, and 68.5% of patients rated themselves very much improved after 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. Adverse events consisted of procedure or CaHA-CMC(+)-related events that were mostly resolved and overwhelmingly mild.
Conclusions: CaHA-CMC(+) produced clinically meaningful and long-lasting improvements in jawline contour and was well tolerated in patients through 60 weeks.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03583359.
Keywords: calcium hydroxylapatite; dermal filler; facial rejuvenation; jawline; volume restoration.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Moradi A, Ðaković R, Odena G. Aesthetic implantation of calcium hydroxylapatite does not interfere with radiological assessment of bones in the dorsum of the hands. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(6):696‐703. doi:10.1093/asj/sjac344
-
- Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, Garcia JK, Silberberg MB. The facial aging process from the "inside out". Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(10):1107‐1119. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaa339
-
- (ISAPS) ISoAPS. Global Statistics. 2020. Accessed May 27, 2023. https://www.isaps.org/media/evbbfapi/isaps‐global‐survey_2020.pdf
-
- Moradi A, Shirazi A, David R. Nonsurgical chin and jawline augmentation using calcium hydroxylapatite and hyaluronic acid fillers. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35(2):140‐148. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1683854
-
- Bass LS, Smith S, Busso M, McClaren M. Calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for treatment of nasolabial folds: long‐term safety and efficacy results. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(2):235‐238. doi:10.1177/1090820X10366549
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
