Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct;23(10):3202-3209.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.16436. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Long-term duration and safety of Radiesse (+) for the treatment of jawline

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term duration and safety of Radiesse (+) for the treatment of jawline

Jeremy B Green et al. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA)-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)+ has unique properties that make it optimal for lifting, contouring, and defining the jawline. This long-term follow-up of a randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded trial reports efficacy and safety of CaHA-CMC(+) through 48 and up to 60 weeks post-treatment.

Methods: Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to the treatment or the control/delayed treatment group to receive CaHA-CMC(+) injections in both jawlines. While touch-ups were permitted 4 weeks post-treatment for both groups, only the treatment group was eligible for optional retreatment after 48 weeks. The primary outcome was ≥1-point improvement on both jawlines on the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS); secondary endpoints included the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) among others. Post hoc analysis included pooling up to 48-week data from the combined treatment and control/delayed groups and 60-week data for the treatment group.

Results: Overall, 175 received treatment. MJAS responder rates were 77.9%, 78.7%, and 62.9% at 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-treatment, respectively. Responder rate on the MJAS at 60 weeks was 74.6% for those who received retreatment and 43.5% for those patients who received only the initial and touchup treatments. SGAIS scores demonstrated 93.4%, 85.6%, and 68.5% of patients rated themselves very much improved after 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. Adverse events consisted of procedure or CaHA-CMC(+)-related events that were mostly resolved and overwhelmingly mild.

Conclusions: CaHA-CMC(+) produced clinically meaningful and long-lasting improvements in jawline contour and was well tolerated in patients through 60 weeks.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03583359.

Keywords: calcium hydroxylapatite; dermal filler; facial rejuvenation; jawline; volume restoration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Moradi A, Ðaković R, Odena G. Aesthetic implantation of calcium hydroxylapatite does not interfere with radiological assessment of bones in the dorsum of the hands. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(6):696‐703. doi:10.1093/asj/sjac344
    1. Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, Garcia JK, Silberberg MB. The facial aging process from the "inside out". Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(10):1107‐1119. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaa339
    1. (ISAPS) ISoAPS. Global Statistics. 2020. Accessed May 27, 2023. https://www.isaps.org/media/evbbfapi/isaps‐global‐survey_2020.pdf
    1. Moradi A, Shirazi A, David R. Nonsurgical chin and jawline augmentation using calcium hydroxylapatite and hyaluronic acid fillers. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35(2):140‐148. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1683854
    1. Bass LS, Smith S, Busso M, McClaren M. Calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for treatment of nasolabial folds: long‐term safety and efficacy results. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(2):235‐238. doi:10.1177/1090820X10366549

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data