Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;36(11):1253-1268.
doi: 10.1111/den.14826. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

International consensus on the management of large (≥20 mm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi study

Affiliations

International consensus on the management of large (≥20 mm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi study

Roupen Djinbachian et al. Dig Endosc. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: There have been significant advances in the management of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) or nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, there is a lack of clear consensus on the management of these lesions with significant geographic variability especially between Eastern and Western paradigms. We aimed to provide an international consensus to better guide management and attempt to homogenize practices.

Methods: Two experts in interventional endoscopy spearheaded an evidence-based Delphi study on behalf of the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee. A steering committee comprising six members devised 51 statements, and 43 experts from 18 countries on six continents participated in a three-round voting process. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree) on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: Forty-two statements reached consensus after three rounds of voting. Recommendations included: three statements on training and competency; 10 statements on preresection evaluation, including optical diagnosis, classification, and staging of LSTs; 14 statements on endoscopic resection indications and technique, including statements on en bloc and piecemeal resection decision-making; seven statements on postresection evaluation; and eight statements on postresection care.

Conclusions: An international expert consensus based on the current available evidence has been developed to guide the evaluation, resection, and follow-up of LSTs. This may provide guiding principles for the global management of these lesions and standardize current practices.

Keywords: Endoscopic resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Endoscopy, Endoscopic mucosal resection; Gastrointestinal cancer; Neoplasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924–926.
    1. van Hattem WA, Shahidi N, Vosko S et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: A retrospective comparison across two successive periods. Gut 2021; 70: 1691–1697.
    1. Barros RA, Monteverde MJ, Dumonceau J‐M et al. Cold snare polypectomy without submucosal injection: Safety and efficacy in 615 large serrated lesions. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1421–E1426.
    1. Kimoto Y, Sakai E, Inamoto R et al. Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy without submucosal injection for large sessile serrated lesions: A prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 20: e132–e138.
    1. Mangira D, Cameron K, Simons K et al. Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1343–1352.