Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jul 1;41(5):478-483.
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000987.

Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral 5 Hz or 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Subacute Stroke: Assessment of Motor Function in a Randomized Controlled Study

Ann A Abdelkader  1 , Lamia M Afifi  1 , Eman A Maher  1 , Abdulalim A Atteya  2 , Dina A El Salmawy  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral 5 Hz or 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Subacute Stroke: Assessment of Motor Function in a Randomized Controlled Study

Ann A Abdelkader et al. J Clin Neurophysiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can enhance brain plasticity after stroke. At low frequencies, rTMS has an inhibitory effect, whereas at high frequencies, it has an excitatory effect. Combining both frequencies in bilateral stimulation is a new rTMS protocol under investigation, especially in the subacute stage.

Methods: Fifty-five patients with subacute stroke were divided into four groups according to the rTMS protocol delivered: bilateral, inhibitory, excitatory, and control groups. All groups received concomitant task-oriented physiotherapy. Pretreatment to posttreatment assessment was performed twice, immediately after sessions and 1 month later. Volitional motor control was evaluated by Fugl-Meyer and Wolf motor function tests, and for spasticity, the Ashworth scale was used.

Results: All groups showed significant improvement. Bilateral, inhibitory, and excitatory groups showed same efficacy, but the bilateral protocol was superior in spasticity. No correlations were found between improvement and stroke duration and site except for spasticity.

Conclusions: Bilateral rTMS shows a comparable effect to inhibitory and excitatory rTMS in improving motor disability in subacute stroke. However, it is superior for spasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Thorvaldsen P, Kuulasmaa K, Rajakangas AM, Rastenyte D, Sarti C, Wilhelmsen L. Stroke trends in the WHO MONICA project. Stroke 1997;28:500–506.
    1. The GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2429–2437.
    1. Sung WH, Wang CP, Chou CL, Chen YC, Chang YC, Tsai PY. Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients. Stroke 2013;44:1375–1382.
    1. Daniel K, Wolfe CDA, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke 2009;40:e431–e440.
    1. Ovbiagele B, Goldstein LB, Higashida RT, et al. Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:2361–2375.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources