Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Aug 1;144(2):171-179.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005661. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Intramural Leiomyomas and Fertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intramural Leiomyomas and Fertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Taïna Laurore Pritts et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate fertility outcomes based on size and number of intramural leiomyomas and outcomes after removal.

Data sources: Online searches: MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov , PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO Library from 1994 to 2023.

Methods of study selection: A total of 5,143 studies were identified, with inclusion of 13 study groups.

Tabulation, integration and results: Outcomes for size and number of leiomyomas were reported with clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates. In data sets with maximum leiomyoma diameters of less than 6 cm for study inclusion, women with leiomyomas smaller than 3 cm had lower clinical pregnancy rates than women without leiomyomas, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.38-0.76) and, for ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates, an OR of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.41-0.86). The ORs for clinical pregnancy rates in women with intermediately-sized leiomyomas (those between 3 cm and 6 cm) were lower than in women without leiomyomas, with an OR at 0.43 (95% CI, 0.29-0.63) and, for ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates, an OR at 0.38 (95% CI, 0.24-0.59). In data sets without exclusion for women with larger-sized leiomyomas, clinical pregnancy rates were lower for those with leiomyomas smaller than 5 cm compared with those without leiomyomas, with an OR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.58-0.96). Women with leiomyomas larger than 5 cm showed no differences in clinical pregnancy rate compared with women without leiomyomas, with an OR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.32-1.58). Although women with a single leiomyoma in any location had no differences in outcomes, those with more than one leiomyoma had lower clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates, with an OR of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.86) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.36-0.88), respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate for women undergoing myomectomy for intramural leiomyomas was no different than those with intramural leiomyomas in situ, with an OR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.77-1.59).

Conclusion: Even small intramural leiomyomas are associated with lower fertility; removal does not confer benefit. Women with more than one leiomyoma in any location have reduced fertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Elizabeth A. Pritts is a scientific advisor for Claria, an instrument company that makes morcellators for use during pelvic surgery. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001;8:483–91. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200108000-00022 - DOI
    1. Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1215–23. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051 - DOI
    1. Parker WH. Uterine myomas: management. Fertil Steril 2007;88:255–71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.044 - DOI
    1. Somigliani F, Vercellini P, Daguati R, Pasin R, De Giorgi O, Crosigniani PG. Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical evaluation of the evidence. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:465–76. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm013 - DOI
    1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000:283:2008–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 - DOI