Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1985 Jul;72(7):548-50.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720717.

Influence of rectal washout on bacterial counts in the rectal stump

Clinical Trial

Influence of rectal washout on bacterial counts in the rectal stump

B E Scammell et al. Br J Surg. 1985 Jul.

Abstract

Forty-three patients undergoing a restorative colorectal resection were randomized to have their rectal stump washed out with either 0.9 per cent saline, 2.5 per cent povidone-iodine or 0.3 per cent sodium hypochlorite. The bacterial counts before and after washout for Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. There was no significant difference in the counts for E. coli before and after washout with saline (log 9.7-log 9.7 organisms/ml) and saline had no influence on the counts of B. fragilis (log 7.9-log 6.5 organisms/ml). Hypochlorite was associated with a significant reduction in E. coli counts (log 6.1-log 1.1 organisms/ml, P less than 0.005) and the counts of B. fragilis (log 8.1-log 0.0 organisms/ml, P less than 0.005). The counts of B. fragilis were significantly reduced by povidone-iodine (log 8.1-log 1.1 organisms/ml, P less than 0.005) but there was no significant reduction in counts of E. coli (log 5.6-log 5.3 organisms/ml). The data suggest that sodium hypochlorite is better than povidone-iodine or saline as a rectal washout for colorectal anastomosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources