Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):1537-1545.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.13604.

Fibula Grafting for Oromandibular Reconstruction and its Effect on Patient Quality of Life - A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Fibula Grafting for Oromandibular Reconstruction and its Effect on Patient Quality of Life - A Scoping Review

Marcel Ebeling et al. In Vivo. 2024 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap has been widely used for oncologic bony reconstruction of both the mandible and maxilla. Early and late morbidities of the donor side such as leg weakness, ankle instability, limited ankle mobility, tibial stress fractures or incision area pain are well documented; however, there is a lack of information about the effects of fibula grafting on patient quality of life. To address this issue, a scoping literature search in the PubMed electronic database was performed to identify all relevant studies and reviews in the period between 2010 and 2022. The potential discomforts after free fibula grafting and their impact on different domains of everyday living were identified and evaluated. The present literature review indicates that donor site morbidity can negatively impact patients' quality of life, albeit generally classified as minor. However, the functional and aesthetic benefits of oromandibular reconstruction clearly outweigh the associated sequelae. Nevertheless, the authors of this review highlight the importance of a comprehensive clinical evaluation of the donor site besides the recipient site during follow-up examinations. This would help to subjectively evaluate the functional and esthetical limitations of a patient's site and promptly detect morbidities that could lead to long-term complications.

Keywords: Fibula grafting; oral cancer; quality of life; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. The Authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flowchart of search strategy.

References

    1. Omura K. Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(3):423–430. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0689-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neville BW, Day TA. Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52(4):195–215. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.52.4.195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Katz RV, Krutchkoff DJ. Intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: Epidemiologic patterns in connecticut from 1935 to 1985. Cancer. 1990;66(6):1288–1296. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1288::aid-cncr2820660632>3.0.co;2-n. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schantz SP, Yu GP. Head and neck cancer incidence trends in young Americans, 1973-1997, with a special analysis for tongue cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2002;128(3):268. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.3.268. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montero PH, Patel SG. Cancer of the oral cavity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24(3):491–508. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources