Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;33(9):3492-3502.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08379-3. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following 120 consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Affiliations

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following 120 consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Peyton M Van Pevenage et al. Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The prone transpsoas approach is a single-position alternative to traditional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Earlier prone LLIF studies have focused on technique, feasibility, perioperative efficiencies, and immediate postoperative radiographic alignment. This study was undertaken to report longer-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, and to identify learnings from experiential evolution of the prone LLIF procedure.

Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing prone LLIF for any indication at one institution were included (n = 120). Demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and outcomes data were captured via prospective institutional registry. Retrospective analysis identified 31 'pre-proceduralization' and 89 'post-proceduralization' prone LLIF approaches, enabling comparison across early and later cohorts.

Results: 187 instrumented LLIF levels were performed. Operative time, retraction time, LLIF blood loss, and hospital stay averaged 150 min, 17 min, 50 ml, and 2.2 days, respectively. 79% of cases were without complication. Postoperative hip flexion weakness was identified in 14%, transient lower extremity weakness in 12%, and sensory deficits in 10%. At last follow-up, back pain, worst-leg pain, Oswestry, and EQ-5D health state improved by 55%, 46%, 48%, and 51%, respectively. 99% improved or maintained sagittal alignment with an average 6.5° segmental lordosis gain at LLIF levels. Only intra-psoas retraction time differed between pre- and post-proceduralization; proceduralization saved an average 3.4 min/level (p = 0.0371).

Conclusions: The largest single-center prone LLIF experience with the longest follow-up to-date shows that it results in few complications, quick recovery, improvements in pain and function, high patient satisfaction, and improved sagittal alignment at an average one year and up to four years postoperatively.

Keywords: Decubitus; LLIF; Minimally invasive; PTP; Proceduralization; Prone-lateral.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ (2015) MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 3):S287–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3886-1 - DOI
    1. Goyal A, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Goncalves S, Bydon M (2018) Outcomes following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion for degenerative low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 167:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gabriel S, Mitchell B, Jalali O, Ta C, Sullivan TB (2022) Positioning considerations for lateral lumbar interbody surgery. Semin Spine Surg 34(2):100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semss.2022.100942 - DOI
    1. Ziino C, Konopka JA, Ajiboye RM, Ledesma JB, Koltsov JC, Cheng I (2018) Single position versus lateral-then-prone positioning for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation. J Spine Surg 4(4):717–724. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2018.12.03 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources