TMJ synovial chondromatosis - an evaluation of 37 patients
- PMID: 38937389
- DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01273-8
TMJ synovial chondromatosis - an evaluation of 37 patients
Abstract
Purpose: The authors evaluated a cohort of 37 patients with histologically verified synovial chondromatosis (SC) between 2013 and 2022.
Methods: The cohort consisted of 37 patients (26 women, 11 men). 36 patients had unilateral involvement, while one patient had bilateral involvement. The average age of the patients was 54.77 years. The authors used the Milgram histopathological classification. They evaluated SC localisation, clinical symptoms, diagnostics and treatment (including recurrence incidence) in this cohort.
Results: In 31 patients (83.7%) SC affected only the upper joint space in one patient (2.7%) the lower space, and in five patients (13.6%) both spaces. 12 patients (32%) were Milgram Stage 1 (presence of synovial metaplasia without loose bodies), eight patients (22%) were Stage 2 (presence of synovial changes, loose bodies), and 17 patients (46%) were Stage 3 (presence of loose bodies, no synovial changes). Pain was the dominant clinical symptom (32 patients, 86.4%). Treatment consisted of arthroscopy and open surgery. Two patients underwent primary reconstruction and total TMJ replacement. Treatment was successful in 89.2% of cases (33 patients), with four (10.8%) patients suffering recurrence.
Conclusion: As this patient cohort shows, pain was the dominant symptom in patients with SC. Magnetic resonance imaging is fundamental in the diagnosis of SC, demonstrating pathological findings even in patients for whom an initial X-ray was negative. These were mainly patients with Milgram Stages 1 and 2 without calcification, loose bodies or pathological changes of the bone structures. This is why the authors recommend MRI for any patient experiencing pain for more than three months, and if this reveals an effusion, joint distension or intraarticular soft tissue mass, they will always indicate arthroscopy. Thorough follow-up of patients is recommended, although SC recurrence is not very frequent. The authors recommend follow-up one, three and six months after surgery, and then annually for the first five years after surgery. They recommend follow-up MRI one, two and five years after surgery.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Brabyn PJ, Capote A, Munoz-Guerra MF, Zylberberg I, Rodrıguez-Campo FJ, Naval-Gı L (2018) Arthroscopic management of synovial chondromatosis of the Temporomandibular Joint. Case Ser Syst Rev J Maxillofac Oral Surg 17(4):401–440 - DOI
-
- Burris B, Guastaldi FPS, Hadad H, Faquin WC, McCain JP (2022) Arthroscopic management of synovial chondromatosis with skull base perforation: a case report and literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 000:e1e10
-
- Jia M, Xu Y, Shao B, Guo Z, Hu L, Pataer L, Abass K, Ling B, Gong Z (2022) Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging in synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint British. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:140–144 - DOI
-
- Jang BG, Huh KH, Kang JH, Kim JE, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS (2021) Imaging features of synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint: a report of 34 cases. Clin Radiol 76:627 .e1e627.e11 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
