Digital interventions to support morality: A scoping review
- PMID: 38937872
- DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12706
Digital interventions to support morality: A scoping review
Abstract
Background: Morality and moral reasoning develop over the course of life, but such development may encounter obstacles. Psycho-educational interventions could be designed to improve moral reasoning and attitude towards prosociality. In the last decades, many interventions employed digital technologies ranging from multicomponent online platforms to serious games and virtual reality, making use of interactivity and immersive properties that could make moral stimuli more engaging.
Aims: This study aimed at reviewing the literature on digital interventions to support morality and moral reasoning, carried out with subjects of all age groups.
Methods and results: Two electronic databases were searched with a systematic approach, and retrieved publications were scanned by authors against inclusion criteria. Twenty-three articles were reviewed. In general, the literature describes encouraging results of digital interventions to support morality. Moreover, a huge variety of morality conceptualizations emerged across various contexts (e.g., professional, school and sports) as well as various outcome measurements (e.g., change in attitudes and change in behaviour).
Conclusions: Effectiveness of digital interventions may relate to immersive and interactive simulations in particular, in that they allow participants not only to learn about moral rules and principles but also to actively exercise their own morality to make decisions. Future research may build on the present scoping review to analyse specific types of interventions' effectiveness with a meta-analytical approach.
Keywords: digital technologies and learning; learning environments; moral education; support for learning; types of learning.
© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Educational Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2008). Morality, self‐control, and crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479–510.
-
- Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32.
-
- *Baghbani, R., Rakhshan, M., Zarifsanaiey, N., Nemati, R., & Daneshi, S. (2022). Comparison of the effectiveness of the electronic portfolio and online discussion forum methods in teaching professional belonging and ethical behaviors to nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 618.
-
- Barbagelata, K., Eadi, J., McNamara, M., Sayles, M., & Smith, J. M. (2021). Aquatic therapy reduces pain and fatigue in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. Rehabilitation Oncology, 39(3), E35–E41.
-
- Barnett, M. A., Quackenbush, S. W., & Sinisi, C. S. (1995). The role of critical experiences in moral development: Implications for justice and care orientations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(1–2), 137–152.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources