Are Bleeding Events Valid as a Surrogate Endpoint for Mortality in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials?
- PMID: 38939574
- PMCID: PMC11198093
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100335
Are Bleeding Events Valid as a Surrogate Endpoint for Mortality in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials?
Keywords: bleeding; patient-centered care; surrogate.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr You is a chief technology officer of PHI Digital Healthcare.
Comment on
References
-
- Djulbegovic B., Guyatt G.H. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;390:415–423. - PubMed
-
- Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1986;2:57–66. - PubMed
-
- SOLVD Investigators. Yusuf S., Pitt B., Davis C.E., Hood W.B., Cohn J.N. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293–302. - PubMed
-
- Digitalis Investigation Group The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:525–533. - PubMed
-
- Long-term effects of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: final report of the GISSI study. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochi-nasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) Lancet. 1987;2:871–874. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
