Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2026 Feb 1;283(2):297-307.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006418. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy/H67: An International Multicenter Study

Jianping Zhao  1 Yuanxiang Lu  1 Wanguang Zhang  1 Darren W Chua  2 Qu Liu  3 Rong Liu  3 Johann Pratschke  4 Francesca Ratti  5 Giuseppe Zimmitti  6 Davit L Aghayan  7 Bjørn Edwin  7 Tiing-Foong Siow  8 Olivier Scatton  9 Paulo Herman  10 Marco V Marino  11 Vincenzo Mazzaferro  12 Adrian K H Chiow  13 Iswanto Sucandy  14 Arpad Ivanecz  15 Sung Hoon Choi  16 Jae Hoon Lee  17 Mikel Gastaca  18 Marco Vivarelli  19 Felice Giuliante  20 Andrea Ruzzenente  21 Chee-Chien Yong  22 Mengqiu Yin  23 Constantino Fondevila  24 Mikhail Efanov  25 Zenichi Morise  26 Fabrizio Di Benedetto  27 Raffaele Brustia  28 Raffaele Dalla Valle  29 Ugo Boggi  30 David Geller  31 Andrea Belli  32 Riccardo Memeo  33 Alejandro Mejia  34 James O Park  35 Fernando Rotellar  36 Gi-Hong Choi  37 Ricardo Robles-Campos  38 Xiaoying Wang  39 Robert P Sutcliffe  40 Eric C H Lai  41 Charing C N Chong  42 Mathieu D'Hondt  43 Kazuteru Monden  44 Santiago Lopez-Ben  45 T Peter Kingham  46 Alessandro Ferrero  47 Giuseppe Maria Ettorre  48 Daniel Cherqui  49 Xiao Liang  50 Olivier Soubrane  51 David Fuks  51 Go Wakabayashi  52 Roberto I Troisi  53 Tan-To Cheung  54 Atsushi Sugioka  55 Tran Cong Duy Long  56 Mohammad Abu Hilal  6   57 Luca Aldrighetti  5 Kuo-Hsin Chen  8 Ho-Seong Han  58 Brian K P Goh  2   59 International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy/H67: An International Multicenter Study

Jianping Zhao et al. Ann Surg. .
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies (L-RPSs)/H67.

Background: Minimally invasive liver resections have seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Over time, challenging procedures such as L-RPS/H67 are also increasingly adopted.

Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 854 patients undergoing minimally invasive RPS in 57 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2021. There were 651 pure L-RPS and 160 robotic RPS. Sixteen outcome indicators of low-risk L-RPS cases were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff.

Results: There were 573 L-RPS/H67 performed in 43 expert centers, of which 254 L-RPS/H67 (44.3%) cases qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, and textbook outcome after L-RPS were 350.8 minutes, 12.5%, 53.8%, 22.9%, 23.8%, 2.8%, 0%, and 4%, respectively.

Conclusions: The present study established the first global benchmark values for L-RPS/H6/7. The benchmark provided an up-to-date reference of the best achievable outcomes for surgical auditing and benchmarking.

Keywords: benchmark; global; hepatectomy; laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy; minimally invasive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.K.P.G. has received travel grants and honorarium from Johnson and Johnson and Olympus. Also, partially funded by a grant from the Intuitive Foundation for this work. M.M. is a consultant for CAVA robotics LLC. J.P. reports a research grant from Intuitive Surgical Deutschland GmbH and personal fees or non-financial support from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, AFS Medical, Astellas, CHG Meridian, Chiesi, Falk Foundation, La Fource Group, Merck, Neovii, NOGGO, pharma-consult Peterson, and Promedicis. Moritz Schmelzle reports personal fees or other support outside of the submitted work from Merck, Bayer, ERBE, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Olympus, Medtronic, Intuitive. Asmund Fretland reports receiving speaker fees from Bayer. vi) Fernando Rotellar reports speaker fees and support outside the submitted work from Integra, Medtronic, Olympus, Corza, Sirtex and Johnson & Johnson. R.T. reports speaker fees and support outside the submitted work from Integra, Stryker, Medtronic, Medistim, MSD. T.P.K. was partially supported by the US National Cancer Institute MSKCC Core Grant number P30 CA008747 for this study. M.Y. was partially funded by the Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Public Welfare Fund project in the Field of Social development (LGF20H160028). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Staiger RD, Schwandt H, Puhan MA, et al. Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking. Br J Surg. 2019;106:59–64.
    1. Goh BKP, Han H-S, Chen K-H, et al. Defining global benchmarks for laparoscopic liver resections: an international multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2023;277:e839–e848.
    1. Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, et al. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg. 2018;267:13–17.
    1. Teo JY, Kam JH, Chan CY, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral lesions-a comparison experience in an Asian centre. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2015;4:379–390.
    1. Nagino M, DeMatteo R, Lang H, et al. Proposal of a new comprehensive notation for hepatectomy: the “new world” terminology. Ann Surg. 2021;274:1–3.

Publication types