Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;64(8):1492-1502.
doi: 10.1111/trf.17934. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

Blood donor return behavior in South Africa and the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

Blood donor return behavior in South Africa and the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Huzbah Jagirdar et al. Transfusion. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Studies preceding the COVID-19 pandemic found that slower time-to-return was associated with first-time, deferred, and mobile drive blood donors. How donor return dynamics changed during the COVID-19 pandemic is not well understood.

Methods: We analyzed visits by whole blood donors from 2017 to 2022 in South Africa (SA) and the United States (US) stratified by mobile and fixed environment, first-time and repeat donor status, and pre-COVID19 (before March 2020) and intra-COVID19. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to characterize time-to-return, cumulative incidence functions to analyze switching between donation environments, and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze factors influencing time-to-return.

Results: Overall time-to-return was shorter in SA. Pre-COVID19, the proportion of donors returning within a year of becoming eligible was lower for deferred donors in both countries regardless of donation environment and deferral type. Intra-COVID19, the gap between deferred and non-deferred donors widened in the US but narrowed in SA, where efforts to schedule return visits from deferred donors were intensified, particularly for non-hemoglobin-related deferrals. Intra-COVID19, the proportion of donors returning within a year in SA was higher for deferred first-time donors (>81%) than for successful first-time donors (80% at fixed sites; 69% at mobile drives).

Conclusions: The pandemic complicated efforts to recruit new donors and schedule returning visits after completed donations. Concerted efforts to improve time-to-return for deferred donors helped mitigate donation loss in SA during the public health emergency.

Keywords: COVID‐19 pandemic; blood donor management; donor deferral; donor recruitment and retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Information for Donors. SANBS – south African National Blood Service. 2016. https://sanbs.org.za/donors/
    1. Association Bulletin #17–02: Updated Strategies to Limit or Prevent Iron Deficiency in Blood Donors. AABB – Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies. 2017. https://www.aabb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/resour...
    1. Zou S, Eder AF, Musavi F, Notari Iv EP, Fang CT, Dodd RY, et al. Implementation of the uniform donor history questionnaire across the American red Cross blood services: increased deferral among repeat presenters but no measurable impact on blood safety. Transfusion. 2007;47(11):1990–1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01422.x
    1. Davison TE, Masser BM, Gemelli CN. Deferred and deterred: a review of literature on the impact of deferrals on blood donors. ISBT Sci Ser. 2020;15(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/voxs.12520
    1. Clement M, Shehu E, Chandler T. The impact of temporary deferrals on future blood donation behavior across the donor life cycle. Transfusion. 2021;61(6):1799–1808. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16387

LinkOut - more resources