Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;253(12):1094-1105.
doi: 10.1002/dvdy.723. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

Differential retinoic acid sensitivity of oral and pharyngeal teeth in medaka (Oryzias latipes) supports the importance of pouch-cleft contacts in pharyngeal tooth initiation

Affiliations

Differential retinoic acid sensitivity of oral and pharyngeal teeth in medaka (Oryzias latipes) supports the importance of pouch-cleft contacts in pharyngeal tooth initiation

D Larionova et al. Dev Dyn. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have claimed that pharyngeal teeth in medaka (Oryzias latipes) are induced independent of retinoic acid (RA) signaling, unlike in zebrafish (Danio rerio). In zebrafish, pharyngeal tooth formation depends on a proper physical contact between the embryonic endodermal pouch anterior to the site of tooth formation, and the adjacent ectodermal cleft, an RA-dependent process. Here, we test the hypothesis that a proper pouch-cleft contact is required for pharyngeal tooth formation in embryonic medaka, as it is in zebrafish. We used 4-[diethylamino]benzaldehyde (DEAB) to pharmacologically inhibit RA production, and thus pouch-cleft contacts, in experiments strictly controlled in time, and analyzed these using high-resolution imaging.

Results: Pharyngeal teeth in medaka were present only when the corresponding anterior pouch had reached the ectoderm (i.e., a physical pouch-cleft contact established), similar to the situation in zebrafish. Oral teeth were present even when the treatment started approximately 4 days before normal oral tooth appearance.

Conclusions: RA dependency for pharyngeal tooth formation is not different between zebrafish and medaka. We propose that the differential response to DEAB of oral versus pharyngeal teeth in medaka could be ascribed to the distinct germ layer origin of the epithelia involved in tooth formation in these two regions.

Keywords: dentition; ectoderm; endoderm; germ layers; pharyngeal pouches; zebrafish.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Nelson GJ. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1969;141:475‐552.
    1. Vandewalle P, Huysseune A, Aerts P, Verraes W. The pharyngeal apparatus in teleost feeding. In: Bels V, Chardon M, Vandewalle P, eds. Biomechanics of Feeding in Vertebrates. Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology. Vol 18. Springer Verlag; 1994:59‐92.
    1. Debiais‐Thibaud M, Borday‐Birraux V, Germon I, et al. Development of oral and pharyngeal teeth in the medaka (Oryzias latipes): comparison of morphology and expression of eve1 gene. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2007;308B:693‐708. doi:10.1002/jez.b.21183
    1. Parenti LR. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of ricefishes, Oryzias and relatives (Beloniformes, Adrianichthyidae). Zool J Linn Soc. 2008;154:494‐610. doi:10.1111/j.1096‐3642.2008.00417.x
    1. Wainwright PC, Smith WL, Price SA, et al. The evolution of pharyngognathy: a phylogenetic and functional appraisal of the pharyngeal jaw key innovation in labroid fishes and beyond. Syst Biol. 2012;61(6):1001‐1027. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys060

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources