Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Jul 22;65(4):491-499.
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae050.

Comparison of mutation spectra induced by gamma-rays and carbon ion beams

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of mutation spectra induced by gamma-rays and carbon ion beams

Yuka Tokuyama et al. J Radiat Res. .

Abstract

The ionizing radiation with high linear energy transfer (LET), such as a heavy ion beam, induces more serious biological effects than low LET ones, such as gamma- and X-rays. This indicates a difference in the DNA damage produced by low and high LET radiations and their biological effects. We have been studying the differences in DNA damage produced by gamma-rays and carbon ion beams. Therefore, we analyze mutations induced by both ionizing radiations to discuss the differences in their biological effects in this study. pUC19 plasmid DNA was irradiated by carbon ion beams in the solution containing 1M dimethyl sulfoxide to mimic a cellular condition. The irradiated DNA was cloned in competent cells of Escherichia coli. The clones harboring some mutations in the region of lacZα were selected, and the sequence alterations were analyzed. A one-deletion mutation is significant in the carbon-irradiated DNA, and the C:G↔T:A transition is minor. On the other hand, the gamma-irradiated DNA shows mainly G:C↔T:A transversion. These results suggest that carbon ion beams produce complex DNA damage, and gamma-rays are prone to single oxidative base damage, such as 8-oxoguanine. Carbon ion beams can also introduce oxidative base damage, and the damage species is 5-hydroxycytosine. This was consistent with our previous results of DNA damage caused by heavy ion beams. We confirmed the causal DNA damage by mass spectrometry for these mutations.

Keywords: base damage; gamma-rays; heavy ion beam; mutation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest in this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The typical images of agarose gel electrophorese for pUC19 DNA irradiated by gamma-rays (A) and carbon ion beams (B). Plots of the yields of Types I, II and III of pUC19 DNA irradiated by gamma-rays (C) and carbon ion beams (D) for the doses from the gel image analyzed by Image J. Respective plots were from the average of two independent experiments.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mutation map of the lacZα regions of pUC19 DNA irradiated by 25 and 50 Gy of gamma-rays (A) and carbon ion beams (B). We performed sequencing on the entire lacZα ORF, which is represented in this figure. As the numbering of Genbank indicates this sequence: M77789.2, this ORF is shown reverse and complemented. The start and stop codons are underlined at CAT and CTA at the tail and leading end of the sequence, respectively. The 25 and 50 Gy mutations are shown at the top and bottom of the sequence in respective figures. The numbers to the left of the sequence are the official numbers for the pUC19 sequence in the nucleotide sequence database.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Yields of 8-OH-G and 5-HO-C in pUC19 DNA determined by LC–MS/MS for dose of gamma-rays (A) and carbon ion beams (B). The horizontal axis shows the dose (Gy), and the vertical axis shows the damaged bases (8-OH-G or 5-HO-C) to 106 of G or C in DNA. Open circles and straight lines indicate 8-OH-G, and closed circles and dotted lines indicate 5-HO-C. The results represent the mean of at least three experiments with their standard deviations. If the standard deviation is small, the line indicating it may be hidden from view in the plot.

References

    1. Goodhead DT. Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 1994;65:7–17. 10.1080/09553009414550021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward JF. The complexity of DNA damage: relevance to biological consequences. Int J Radiat Biol 1994;66:427–32. 10.1080/09553009414551401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terato H, Tanaka R, Nakaarai Y et al. Quantitative analysis of isolated and clustered DNA damage induced by gamma-rays, carbon ion beams and iron ion beams. J Radiat Res 2008;49:133–46. 10.1269/jrr.07089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tokuyama Y, Furusawa Y, Ide H et al. Role of isolated and clustered DNA damage and the post-irradiating repair process in the effects of heavy ion beam irradiation. J Radiat Res 2015;56:446–55. 10.1093/jrr/rru122. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Terato H, Ide H. Clustered DNA damage induced by heavy ion particles. Biol Sci Space 2004;18:206–15. 10.2187/bss.18.206. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources