Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306041.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306041. eCollection 2024.

The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification

Affiliations

The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification

Zengjin Liu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Based on 908 consumer questionnaire data from 15 urban areas in Shanghai, we use the binary logit model to empirically analyze the impact of traceability label trust on consumers' traceable pork purchase behavior and the moderating effect of food safety identification. After constructing the theoretical analysis framework, this paper verifies it from the two aspects of statistical analysis and econometric analysis and tests the robustness of the final results. The results show that: first, traceability label trust has a significant positive impact on consumers' traceability pork behavior. Second, food safety identification can significantly strengthen and promote this process. Third, consumers' purchasing behavior is significantly positively affected by traceable pork consumption scenarios and price labels, but the permanent elderly in the composition of family members significantly negative impact on it. Therefore, we put forward relevant policy suggestions, such as strengthening the knowledge popularization and publicity based on the advantageous commodity attributes of traceable pork, carrying out food safety knowledge popularization education, and enhancing consumers' risk perception and food safety identification ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Theoretical model of influencing factors of consumers’ traceable pork purchasing behavior.
Source: Author Composition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mc Carthy U, Uysal I, Badia-Melis R, Mercier S, O’Donnell C, Ktenioudaki A. Global food security ‐ Issues, challenges and technological solutions. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2018;77:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.002 PMID: WOS:000436219000002. - DOI
    1. Han GH, Zhai YD. Perceptions of food safety, access to information, and political trust in China. Chinese Journal of Communication. 2022;15(4):534–57. doi: 10.1080/17544750.2022.2052129 PMID: WOS:000772361600001. - DOI
    1. Lam HM, Remais J, Fung MC, Xu LQ, Sun SSM. Food supply and food safety issues in China. Lancet. 2013;381(9882):2044–53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60776-X PMID: WOS:000320924400033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng S, Xu P, Wang ZG, Song SF. Willingness to pay for traceable pork: evidence from Beijing, China. China Agric Econ Rev. 2012;4(2):200–15. doi: 10.1108/17561371211224782 PMID: WOS:000311001600006. - DOI
    1. Hong W, Mao JL, Wu LH, Pu XJ. Public cognition of the application of blockchain in food safety managementdData from China’s Zhihu platform. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;303:9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127044 PMID: WOS:000655704400006. - DOI