Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 28;141(5):1235-1243.
doi: 10.3171/2024.3.JNS24116. Print 2024 Nov 1.

Microsurgical management of recurrent intracranial aneurysm after endovascular treatment: a series of 60 consecutive patients

Affiliations

Microsurgical management of recurrent intracranial aneurysm after endovascular treatment: a series of 60 consecutive patients

Jean-Paul Lejeune et al. J Neurosurg. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity associated with microsurgical treatment in patients with a recurrent aneurysm to improve their surgical management.

Methods: From 2012 to 2022, among the 3128 patients with ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms managed at the authors' institution, 954 patients were treated by a microsurgical procedure. Of these 3128 patients, 60 consecutive patients (6.3%) who had a recurrent microsurgically treated aneurysm after previous endovascular treatment were included in this study. Additional microsurgical treatment was considered in case of progressive remnant growth or significant aneurysm recurrence. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted. Early (< 7 days) and long-term clinical and radiological monitoring were performed. Good functional outcome was considered as a modified Rankin Scale score < 3.

Results: The mean age at initial treatment was 45 years (range 26-65 years). The mean delay between the first treatment and microsurgical treatment of the recurrence was 64 months (range 2 days-296 months). The mean size of the fundus recurrence was 5 mm, and the mean size of the neck recurrence was 4.6 mm. Five patients (8.3%) presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with rupture of the recurrent aneurysm. Three patients died (6%) of aneurysm rupture and/or intensive care complications. The total morbidity rate associated with the microsurgical procedure was 14.5% (8/55) in patients with unruptured recurrent aneurysms. Among these patients, postoperative definitive complications (ischemic lesions) directly related to the microsurgical procedure were present in 3 patients (5.5%). Intraoperative rupture was recorded in these 3 patients. In the 54 surviving patients with unruptured recurrent aneurysms, good functional outcome was noted in 49 (91%). Poor functional outcome was significantly associated with intraoperative rupture.

Conclusions: Microsurgery remains an effective therapeutic option for recurrent intracranial aneurysms. However, in the authors' experience, postoperative morbidity is higher than in patients with nonrecurrent aneurysms. Therefore, a pretherapeutic multidisciplinary evaluation is mandatory to reduce the potential morbidity associated with the retreatment as much as possible. When endovascular occlusion of the aneurysm requires both stenting and coiling, alternative microsurgical treatment should be carefully evaluated, as microsurgical clipping will become much more challenging in cases of aneurysm recurrence.

Keywords: bypass; endovascular neurosurgery; microsurgery; recurrent aneurysm; vascular disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources