Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Aug;61(4):252-4.
doi: 10.1136/sti.61.4.252.

Evaluation of a genus reactive monoclonal antibody in rapid identification of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence

Comparative Study

Evaluation of a genus reactive monoclonal antibody in rapid identification of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence

I Alexander et al. Genitourin Med. 1985 Aug.

Abstract

This study compared the direct visualisation of elementary bodies in urogenital smears by the direct immunofluorescence test with the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures treated with cytochalasin B. C trachomatis was isolated from 41 (16.4%) of 250 unselected specimens in McCoy cell cultures treated with cytochalasin B. Of the 41 culture positive specimens 37 (90%) were diagnosed by direct visualisation of elementary bodies in the smears using the direct immunofluorescence test. Four specimens were positive by isolation only and a further seven were positive by the direct immunofluorescence test only. Overall the direct immunofluorescence test had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 97%. The presence of red blood cells or mucus or the use of barrier creams did not appear to interfere with the normal visualisation of elementary bodies using the direct immunofluorescence test.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Med Lab Technol. 1974 Jan;31(1):7-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Apr;1(4):345-52 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 23;298(8):428-35 - PubMed
    1. Br J Vener Dis. 1980 Apr;56(2):92-5 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1982 Sep 11;2(8298):574-7 - PubMed

Publication types