Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Low-Contrast-Dose Dual-Energy CT in Patients With Renal Impairment Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
- PMID: 38942457
- PMCID: PMC11214918
- DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1207
Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Low-Contrast-Dose Dual-Energy CT in Patients With Renal Impairment Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and safety of low-contrast-dose, dual-source dual-energy CT before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with compromised renal function.
Materials and methods: A total of 54 consecutive patients (female:male, 26:38; 81.9 ± 7.3 years) with reduced renal function underwent pre-TAVR dual-energy CT with a 30-mL contrast agent between June 2022 and March 2023. Monochromatic (40- and 50-keV) and conventional (120-kVp) images were reconstructed and analyzed. The subjective quality score, vascular attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared among the imaging techniques using the Friedman test and post-hoc analysis. Interobserver reliability for aortic annular measurement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The procedural outcomes and incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury (AKI) were assessed.
Results: Monochromatic images achieved diagnostic quality in all patients. The 50-keV images achieved superior vascular attenuation and CNR (P < 0.001 in all) while maintaining a similar SNR compared to conventional CT. For aortic annular measurement, the 50-keV images showed higher interobserver reliability compared to conventional CT: ICC, 0.98 vs. 0.90 for area and 0.97 vs. 0.95 for perimeter; 95% limits of agreement width, 0.63 cm² vs. 0.92 cm² for area and 5.78 mm vs. 8.50 mm for perimeter. The size of the implanted device matched CT-measured values in all patients, achieving a procedural success rate of 92.6%. No patient experienced a serum creatinine increase of ≥ 1.5 times baseline in the 48-72 hours following CT. However, one patient had a procedural delay due to gradual renal function deterioration.
Conclusion: Low-contrast-dose imaging with 50-keV reconstruction enables precise pre-TAVR evaluation with improved image quality and minimal risk of post-contrast AKI. This approach may be an effective and safe option for pre-TAVR evaluation in patients with compromised renal function.
Keywords: Aortic valve stenosis; Computed tomography angiography; Contrast media; Monochromatic; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2024 The Korean Society of Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Kyunghwa Han, who holds the respective position of Statistical Consultant of the
Figures


Similar articles
-
Value of a noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction technique in dual-energy CT for planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Eur Radiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):705-714. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4422-3. Epub 2016 May 28. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27236818
-
Reduction of contrast medium for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning using a spectral detector CT: a prospective clinical trial.Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):4089-4099. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10403-x. Epub 2023 Nov 18. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37979008 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Low contrast medium-volume third-generation dual-source computed tomography angiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning.Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):1944-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4537-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27553939
-
Low-volume contrast medium protocol for comprehensive cardiac and aortoiliac CT assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Acad Radiol. 2015 Sep;22(9):1138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Acad Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26094116
-
Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Sizing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013463. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013463. Epub 2019 Sep 24. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31549579 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefèvre T, Hovasse T, Morice MC, Chevalier B, et al. Impact of CT-guided valve sizing on post-procedural aortic regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:546–555. - PubMed
-
- Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann HC, Gleason TG, Hanzel G, et al. STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2492–2516. - PubMed
-
- Elhmidi Y, Bleiziffer S, Deutsch MA, Krane M, Mazzitelli D, Lange R, et al. Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, predictors and impact on mortality. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107:133–139. - PubMed
-
- Hibino M, Yoon SH, Dallan LAP, Pelletier MP, Rushing GD, Filby SJ, et al. Feasibility and safety of exclusive noncontrast computed tomography for planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expandable valves. Am J Cardiol. 2023;190:122–124. - PubMed
-
- Suh YJ, Lee S, Hong GR, Ko YG, Hong MK, Kim YJ. Feasibility of aortic annular measurements using noncontrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography in preprocedural evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022;46:50–55. - PubMed