Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 1;39(3):daae072.
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae072.

Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: a qualitative study

Sophie Mulcahy Symmons et al. Health Promot Int. .

Abstract

Organized cervical screening programmes are commonplace in high-income countries. To provide an equitable cervical screening service, it is important to understand who is and is not attending screening and why. Promotion of screening and service improvement is not possible without recognition and identification of the barriers and needs of communities that are less engaged with screening. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening attendance and accessibility in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare professionals, policymakers and academics. Interviews were conducted online in 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was used inductively to generate themes, supported by NVivo. Three themes were developed: (i) getting the right information out the right way, (ii) acceptability and accessibility of screening and (iii) trying to identify and reach the non-attenders. Participants felt public knowledge of cervical screening and human papilloma virus was low and communication strategies were not adequate. Individual, cultural, structural and service-level factors influenced the accessibility and acceptability of screening. Identifying and reaching non-attenders was considered challenging and community outreach could support those less likely to attend screening. Stakeholder perspectives were valuable in understanding the complexities of screening accessibility and attendance from individual to service-level factors. Cultural competency training, inclusive language and visual cues in waiting rooms would support engagement with some populations who may be hesitant to attend screening. Collaboration with community organizations has opportunities to promote screening and understand the needs of those less likely to attend screening.

Keywords: Ireland; cancer; cervical cancer screening; engagement; participation; qualitative methods; screening; social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Map of themes.

Similar articles

References

    1. Banerjee, S. C., Staley, J. M., Alexander, K., Walters, C. B. and Parker, P. A. (2020) Encouraging patients to disclose their lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) status: oncology health care providers’ perspectives. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10, 918–927. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2022) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
    1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
    1. Brzoska, P., Aksakal, T. and Yilmaz-Aslan, Y. (2020) Utilization of cervical cancer screening among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: results from a large-scale population survey. BMC Public Health, 20, 5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Central Statistics Office. (2020) Health determinants. https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-ihsmr/irishhealthsurv... (11 February 2024, date last accessed).