Assessing numeracy and medication calculations within undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study
- PMID: 38946052
- PMCID: PMC11214913
- DOI: 10.1002/nop2.2226
Assessing numeracy and medication calculations within undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study
Abstract
Aim: To explore how undergraduate nursing students are assessed on nursing numeracy and medication calculations from the perspective of Australian nurse education leaders.
Design: A qualitative study.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 nurse education leaders between November 2022 and January 2023. Braun and Clarke's six phases of thematic analysis were used to analyse the data.
Results: Five key themes were identified: (i) high expectations to keep the public safe, (ii) diverse assessment formats, (iii) different ways of managing assessment integrity, (iv) assessment conditions incongruent to the clinical setting and (v) supporting struggling students.
Conclusion: Nurse education leaders set high standards requiring students to achieve 100% in numeracy and medication calculation assessments, thus maintaining the reputation of nursing and patient safety. However, students struggled to meet this expectation. Diverse assessment formats were implemented, with some examination conditions contrary to clinical practice. Currently, there is no benchmark or independent point of registration examination in Australia, hence the problem is each university had a different standard to judge students' competence. Gaining insight into how these assessments are conducted provides an opportunity to work towards an evidence-based model or benchmark for the assessment of numeracy.
Implications for the profession: Dosage errors in clinical practice threaten patient safety and the reputation of the nursing profession. The accuracy rate of calculations by undergraduate and registered nurses is deficient worldwide. This research highlights a major educational issue, that being the wide variation in how numeracy assessments are conducted with no clear pedagogical rationale for a standardised method. Such assessments would establish a national standard, contributing to quality assurance, the development of the nursing profession and improve patient safety.
Keywords: assessment; dosage competency; medication calculations; nursing numeracy; patient safety; undergraduate education; undergraduate nursing students.
© 2024 The Author(s). Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Nurse education leaders' perspectives on the teaching of numeracy to undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative research study.Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103754. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103754. Epub 2023 Aug 19. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023. PMID: 37619287
-
Nurse academics' self-reported insights into the teaching of undergraduate nursing numeracy: A national cross-sectional study.Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104058. Epub 2024 Jul 6. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024. PMID: 38991260
-
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
-
Assessment of undergraduate nursing students' medication administration competency: A systematic review.Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Aug;151:106744. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106744. Epub 2025 Apr 12. Nurse Educ Today. 2025. PMID: 40273614
-
The contributors to dosage calculation ability and its applicability to nursing education: An integrative review.J Prof Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb;50:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 28. J Prof Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38369376 Review.
References
-
- Australian Nursing & Midwifery Accreditation Council . (2019). Registered nurse accreditation standards 2019 . https://www.anmac.org.au/standards‐and‐review/registered‐nurse
-
- Basak, T. , & Yildiz, D. (2014). Comparison of the effects of cooperative learning and traditional learning methods on the improvement of drug‐dose calculation skills of nursing students undergoing internships. Health Education Journal, 73(3), 341–350. 10.1177/0017896912471136 - DOI
-
- Bloomfield, J. G. , Crawford, T. , & Fisher, M. (2021). Registered nurses understanding of academic honesty and the perceived relationship to professional conduct: Findings from a cross‐sectional survey conducted in Southeast Asia. Nurse Education Today, 100(104794), 1–7. 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104794 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brabcová, I. , Hajduchová, H. , Tóthová, V. , Chloubová, I. , Červený, M. , Prokešová, R. , Malý, J. , Vlček, J. , Doseděl, M. , & Malá‐Ládová, K. (2023). Reasons for medication administration errors, barriers to reporting them and the number of reported medication administration errors from the perspective of nurses: A cross‐sectional survey. Nurse Education in Practice, 70(103642), 1–9. 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103642 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources