Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38946054
- DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2360094
Laparoscopic and robotic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: As life expectancy has been increasing, older patients are becoming more central to the healthcare system, leading to more intensive care use and longer hospital stays. Nevertheless, advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques offer safe and effective options for older patients with colorectal diseases. This study aims to provide comprehensive evidence on the role of minimally invasive surgery in treating colorectal diseases in older patients.
Material and methods: All articles directly compared the minimally invasive approach with open surgery in patients aged ≥65 years. The present metanalysis took 30-day complications as primary outcomes. Length of hospital stay, readmission, and 30-day mortality were also assessed, as secondary outcomes. Further subgroup analyses were carried out based on surgery setting, lesion features, and location.
Results: After searching the main databases, 84 articles were included. Evaluation of 30-day complications rate, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality significantly favored minimally invasive approaches. The outcome readmission did not show any significant difference.
Conclusions: The current metanalysis demonstrates clear advantages of minimally invasive techniques over open surgery in colorectal procedures for older patients, particularly in reducing complications, mortality, and hospitalization. This suggests that prioritizing these techniques, based on available expertise and facilities, could improve outcomes and quality of care for older patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Keywords: Colorectal surgery; minimally invasive techniques; older patients.
Similar articles
-
Trends and outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study of minimally invasive versus open techniques in Germany.Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6338-6346. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11210-1. Epub 2024 Aug 29. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39210061 Free PMC article.
-
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. Epub 2015 Dec 29. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26715021
-
A Regional and National Database Comparison of Colorectal Outcomes.JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4):e2018.00031. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00031. JSLS. 2018. PMID: 30410300 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic ambulatory colorectal resections: a systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2024 May 7;18(1):202. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01961-3. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38713324 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures with Bowel Surgery: A Systematic Review.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Feb;26(2):288-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30366117
Cited by
-
Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Insufficiencies in the Lower GI Tract.Visc Med. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1159/000547021. Online ahead of print. Visc Med. 2025. PMID: 40688737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Surgical and Anesthetic Procedures after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study (The PROCOL Study).Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 21;60(8):1362. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081362. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39202644 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors: a meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 19;14:1486504. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1486504. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39629002 Free PMC article.
-
National trends in operative approach to esophagectomy: utilization rates, outcomes, and overall survival.Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2267-2274. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11563-1. Epub 2025 Feb 12. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39939552
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials