Histopathological risk assessment in multisite epithelial dysplasia: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 38946217
- DOI: 10.1111/odi.15052
Histopathological risk assessment in multisite epithelial dysplasia: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: Histopathological grading of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is the current standard for stratifying cancer progression risk but is associated with subjectivity and variability. This problem is not commonly seen regarding the grading of epithelial dysplasia in other sites. This systematic review aims to compare grading systems for oral, anal, penile, and cervical epithelial dysplasia to determine their predictive accuracy for recurrence and malignant transformation (MT) outcomes.
Methods: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023403035) and was reported according to the PRISMA checklist. A comprehensive search was performed in the main databases and gray literature. The risk of bias in individual studies was analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for each study design.
Results: Forty-six studies were deemed eligible and included in this systematic review, of which 45 were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that the binary system demonstrated a higher predictive ability for MT/recurrence of OED compared to multilevel systems. Higher predictive accuracy of MT was also observed for binary grading systems in anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Conclusions: No significant difference was found between the current grading systems of epithelial dysplasia in different body parts. However, binary grading systems have shown better clinical outcomes.
Keywords: epithelial dysplasia; histopathological grading; intraepithelial neoplasia; precancerous conditions; systematic review.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alder, S., Megyessi, D., Sundström, K., Östensson, E., Mints, M., Belkic, K., Arbyn, M., & Andersson, S. (2020). Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease—A 16‐year follow‐up study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 222, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.042
-
- Arduino, P. G., Surace, A., Carbone, M., Elia, A., Massolini, G., Gandolfo, S., & Broccoletti, R. (2009). Outcome of oral dysplasia: A retrospective hospital‐based study of 207 patients with a long follow‐up. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 38, 540–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0714.2009.00782.x
-
- Arens, Y., Gaisa, M., Goldstone, S. E., Liu, Y., Wisnivesky, J., Sigel, C. S., Swartz, T. H., & Sigel, K. (2019). Risk of invasive anal cancer in HIV‐infected patients with high‐grade anal dysplasia: A population‐based cohort study. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 62, 934–940. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001384
-
- Barnes, L., Eveson, J. W., & Reichard, P. (2005). World Health Organization pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours (1st ed.). IARC.
-
- Bernard, C., Zhang, J. Z., Klieb, H., Blanas, N., Xu, W., & Magalhaes, M. (2023). Clinical outcomes of oral epithelial dysplasia managed by observation versus excision. Head & Neck, 45(12), 3096–3106. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27539
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
