Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan-Feb;13(1):6-15.
doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000034. Epub 2023 Dec 1.

Controversies in endobronchial ultrasound

Affiliations
Review

Controversies in endobronchial ultrasound

Christoph F Dietrich et al. Endosc Ultrasound. 2024 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a minimally invasive highly accurate and safe endoscopic technique for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and mediastinal masses including centrally located lung tumors. The combination of transbronchial and transoesophageal tissue sampling has improved lung cancer staging, reducing the need for more invasive and surgical diagnostic procedures. Despite the high level of evidence regarding EBUS use in the aforementioned situations, there are still challenges and controversial issues such as follows: Should informed consent for EBUS and flexible bronchoscopy be different? Is EBUS able to replace standard bronchoscopy in patients with suspected lung cancer? Which is the best position, screen orientation, route of intubation, and sedation/anesthesia to perform EBUS? Is it advisable to use a balloon in all procedures? How should the operator acquire skills and how should competence be ensured? This Pro-Con article aims to address these open questions.

Keywords: EBUS; Lung cancer staging; Mediastinal masses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Christoph F. Dietrich is the coeditor-in-chief of the journal; Michael Hocke, Lars Konge, and Christian Jenssen are editorial board members. This article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of the editors and their research group.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Olympus EBUS scope (BF-UC190F) with specific parameters for handling. EBUS: endobronchial ultrasound.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of field of view and image quality between the EBUS Videoscope EB 19-J10U and the Videobronchoscope EB 19-10 (PENTAX Medical, Hamburg, Germany) at the level of larynx (a1, a2). Comparison of field of view and image quality between the EBUS Videoscope EB 19-J10U and the Videobronchoscope EB 19-10 (PENTAX Medical). Visualization of the tracheal bifurcation (b1, b2). EBUS: endobronchial ultrasound.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EBUS scope through a laryngeal mask. Entrance through the esophagus (left image) and through the vocal cords into the tracheobronchial tree (right image). EBUS: endobronchial ultrasound.
Figure 4
Figure 4
High-pressure suction applied directly to the needle (as described by Tsaknis et al.[42]

References

    1. Dietrich CF Arcidiacono PG Braden B, et al. . What should be known prior to performing EUS? Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8:3–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietrich CF Arcidiacono PG Braden B, et al. . What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II). Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8:360–369. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Testoni SGG, Healey AJ, Dietrich CF, Arcidiacono PG. Systematic review of endoscopy ultrasound-guided thermal ablation treatment for pancreatic cancer. Endosc Ultrasound 2020;9:83–100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rimbas M Larghi A Fusaroli P, et al. . How to perform EUS-guided tattooing? Endosc Ultrasound 2020;9:291–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietrich CF Burmeister S Hollerbach S, et al. . Do we need elastography for EUS? Endosc Ultrasound 2020;9(5):284–290. - PMC - PubMed