Controversies in endobronchial ultrasound
- PMID: 38947115
- PMCID: PMC11213616
- DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000034
Controversies in endobronchial ultrasound
Abstract
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a minimally invasive highly accurate and safe endoscopic technique for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and mediastinal masses including centrally located lung tumors. The combination of transbronchial and transoesophageal tissue sampling has improved lung cancer staging, reducing the need for more invasive and surgical diagnostic procedures. Despite the high level of evidence regarding EBUS use in the aforementioned situations, there are still challenges and controversial issues such as follows: Should informed consent for EBUS and flexible bronchoscopy be different? Is EBUS able to replace standard bronchoscopy in patients with suspected lung cancer? Which is the best position, screen orientation, route of intubation, and sedation/anesthesia to perform EBUS? Is it advisable to use a balloon in all procedures? How should the operator acquire skills and how should competence be ensured? This Pro-Con article aims to address these open questions.
Keywords: EBUS; Lung cancer staging; Mediastinal masses.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Scholar Media Publishing.
Conflict of interest statement
Christoph F. Dietrich is the coeditor-in-chief of the journal; Michael Hocke, Lars Konge, and Christian Jenssen are editorial board members. This article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of the editors and their research group.
Figures




References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources