Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1.
doi: 10.1111/jan.16300. Online ahead of print.

Development of an instrument to measure the competencies of health professionals in the process of evidence-based healthcare: A Delphi study

Shuang Wang  1   2 , Jiayi Zhang  1   2 , Lijie Wang  1   2 , Jin Liang  1   2 , Xiaofen Wu  3 , Xiran Li  4 , Lili Zhang  1 , Ning Wang  2
Affiliations

Development of an instrument to measure the competencies of health professionals in the process of evidence-based healthcare: A Delphi study

Shuang Wang et al. J Adv Nurs. .

Abstract

Aims: To identify and reach consensus on dimensions and criteria of a competence assessment instrument for health professionals in relation to the process of evidence-based healthcare.

Design: A two-round Delphi survey was carried out from April to June 2023.

Methods: Consensus was sought from an expert panel on the instrument preliminarily established based on the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare and a rapid review of systematic reviews of relevant literature. The level of consensus was reflected by the concentration and coordination of experts' opinions and percentage of agreement. The instrument was revised significantly based on the combination of data analysis, the experts' comments and research group discussions.

Results: Sixteen national and three international experts were involved in the first-round Delphi survey and 17 experts participated in the second-round survey. In both rounds, full consensus was reached on the four dimensions of the instrument, namely evidence-generation, evidence-synthesis, evidence-transfer and evidence-implementation. In round-one, the instrument was revised from 77 to 61 items. In round-two, the instrument was further revised to have 57 items under the four dimensions in the final version.

Conclusion: The Delphi survey achieved consensus on the instrument. The validity and reliability of the instrument needs to be tested in future research internationally.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Systematic assessment of nurses and other health professionals' competencies in different phases of evidence-based healthcare process based on this instrument provides implications for their professional development and multidisciplinary team collaboration in evidence-based practice and better care process and outcomes.

Impact: This study addresses a research gap of lacking an instrument to systematically assess interprofessional competencies in relation to the process of EBHC. The instrument covers the four phases of EBHC process with minimal criteria, highlighting essential aspects of ability to be developed. Identification of health professionals' level of competence in these aspects helps strengthen their capacity accordingly so as to promote virtuous EBHC ecosystem for the ending purpose of improving global healthcare outcomes.

Reporting method: This study was reported in line with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDES) guidance on Delphi studies.

Patient and public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Keywords: Delphi study; competence; evidence‐based healthcare; evidence‐based practice; health professionals; instrument; nurse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Al, J. F., Kvist, T., & Turunen, H. (2023). Core competencies of healthcare professionals in Oman: Research and evidence‐based practice needs attention. Nursing Open, 10(4), 2053–2065. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1453
    1. Albarqouni, L., Hoffmann, T., & Glasziou, P. (2018). Evidence‐based practice educational intervention studies: A systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909‐018‐1284‐1
    1. Albarqouni, L., Hoffmann, T., Straus, S., Olsen, N. R., Young, T., Ilic, D., Shaneyfelt, T., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G., & Glasziou, P. (2018). Core competencies in evidence‐based practice for health professionals: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi survey. JAMA Network Open, 1(2), e180281. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281
    1. Bank, L., Jippes, M., van Luijk, S., den Rooyen, C., Scherpbier, A., & Scheele, F. (2015). Specialty training's organizational readiness for curriculum change (STORC): Development of a questionnaire in a Delphi study. BMC Medical Education, 15, 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909‐015‐0408‐0
    1. Belita, E., Squires, J. E., Yost, J., Ganann, R., Burnett, T., & Dobbins, M. (2020). Measures of evidence‐informed decision‐making competence attributes: A psychometric systematic review. BMC Nursing, 19, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912‐020‐00436‐8

LinkOut - more resources