Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Aug 1;10(8):1097-1103.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.3196.

Fluorine-18 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT vs Multiparametric MRI for Locoregional Staging of Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Fluorine-18 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT vs Multiparametric MRI for Locoregional Staging of Prostate Cancer

Nikhile Mookerji et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) demonstrates overexpression in prostate cancer and correlates with tumor aggressiveness. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) is superior to conventional imaging for the metastatic staging of prostate cancer per current research but studies of second-generation PSMA PET radioligands for locoregional staging are limited.

Objective: To determine the accuracy of fluorine-18 PSMA-1007 PET/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT) compared to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the primary locoregional staging of intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancers.

Design, setting, and participants: The Next Generation Trial was a phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study assessing the accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI for locoregional staging of prostate cancer, with results of histopathologic examination as the reference standard comparator. Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists were blinded to preoperative clinical, pathology, and imaging data. Patients underwent all imaging studies and radical prostatectomies at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Eligible participants included men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer who consented to radical prostatectomy. Participants who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in the final analysis. Patients were recruited between March 2022 and June 2023, and data analysis occurred between July 2023 and December 2023.

Exposures: All participants underwent both 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI within 2 weeks of one another and before radical prostatectomy.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the correct identification of the prostate cancer tumor stage by each imaging test. The secondary outcomes were correct identification of the dominant nodule, laterality, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesical invasion.

Results: Of 150 eligible men with prostate cancer, 134 patients ultimately underwent radical prostatectomy (mean [SD] age at prostatectomy, 62.0 [5.7] years). PSMA PET was superior to MRI for the accurate identification of the final pathological tumor stage (61 [45%] vs 38 [28%]; P = .003). PSMA PET was also superior to MRI for the correct identification of the dominant nodule (126 [94%] vs 112 [83%]; P = .01), laterality (86 [64%] vs 60 [44%]; P = .001), and extracapsular extension (100 [75%] vs 84 [63%]; P = .01), but not for seminal vesicle invasion (122 [91%] vs 115 [85%]; P = .07).

Conclusions and relevance: In this phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was superior to MRI for the locoregional staging of prostate cancer. These findings support PSMA PET in the preoperative workflow of intermediate-risk and high-risk tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flow Diagram of Study Design and Participants
This diagram shows the flow of patients through the study from 275 patients assessed for eligibility to 150 patients enrolled and 134 patients with final analyzable data. ADT indicates androgen deprivation therapy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; and PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Comment in

References

    1. Turkbey B, Albert PS, Kurdziel K, Choyke PL. Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1471-1480. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2527 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mason RJ, Marzouk K, Finelli A, et al. . UPDATE—2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging—summary of changes. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;16(4):86-87. doi:10.5489/cuaj.7832 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. . Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I: introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022;208(1):10-18. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. . EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):618-629. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):856-863. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types