Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e083399.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083399.

Infant formula supplemented with milk fat globule membrane compared with standard infant formula for the cognitive development of healthy term-born formula-fed infants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Infant formula supplemented with milk fat globule membrane compared with standard infant formula for the cognitive development of healthy term-born formula-fed infants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Jacqueline F Gould et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) is a complex lipid-protein structure in mammalian milk and human milk that is largely absent from breastmilk substitutes. The objective of this trial is to investigate whether providing infant formula enriched with MFGM versus standard infant formula improves cognitive development at 12 months of age in exclusively formula-fed full-term infants.

Methods and analysis: This is a randomised, controlled, clinician-blinded, researcher-blinded and participant-blinded trial of two parallel formula-fed groups and a breastfed reference group that were recruited in the suburban Adelaide (Australia) community by a single study centre (a medical research institute). Healthy, exclusively formula-fed, singleton, term-born infants under 8 weeks of age were randomised to either an MFGM-supplemented formula (intervention) or standard infant formula (control) from enrolment until 12 months of age. The reference group was not provided with formula. The primary outcome is the Cognitive Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Fourth Edition (Bayley-IV) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are the Bayley-IV Cognitive Scale at 24 months, other Bayley-IV domains (language, motor, emotional and behavioural development) at 12 and 24 months of age, infant attention at 4 and 9 months of age, parent-rated language at 12 and 24 months of age, parent-rated development at 6 and 18 months of age as well as growth, tolerance and safety of the study formula. To ensure at least 80% power to detect a 5-point difference in the mean Bayley-IV cognitive score, >200 infants were recruited in each group.

Ethics and dissemination: The Women's and Children Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee reviewed and approved the study (HREC/19/WCHN/140). Caregivers gave written informed consent prior to enrolling in the trial. Findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12620000552987; Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: anzctr.org.au.

Keywords: Developmental neurology & neurodisability; NUTRITION & DIETETICS; PAEDIATRICS; Randomized Controlled Trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The project was funded by the sponsor, Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited, Auckland, New Zealand, and funding was paid to the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. MM is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship ID: GNT 2016756. Study products were provided by Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited. The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council has no role in the study design; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication and have no authority over any of these activities. Honoraria have been paid to Dr Gould’s institution to support conference travel by NuMega Ingredients. No other competing interests are declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow from screening to enrolment and randomisation in the trial. SAHMRI, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Age of participants at study milestones. 1Timing of phone calls are based on days since enrolment, therefore infant age at phone calls varied. 2Optional face-to-face visit or virtual appointment. 3Primary outcome collected at 12-month appointment.

References

    1. Lönnerdal B. Bioactive proteins in human milk: mechanisms of action. J Pediatr 2010;156:S26–30. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.11.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horta B, CG V. Long-Term Effects of Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review. Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
    1. Belfort MB, Knight E, Chandarana S, et al. . Associations of maternal milk feeding with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 7 years of age in former preterm infants. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21608 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kramer MS, Aboud F, Mironova E, et al. . Breastfeeding and child cognitive development: new evidence from a large randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65:578–84. 10.1001/archpsyc.65.5.578 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson JW, Johnstone BM, Remley DT. Breast-feeding and cognitive development: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:525–35. 10.1093/ajcn/70.4.525 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types