Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun;95(1):70-86.
doi: 10.1111/prd.12577. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

Radiographic assessment of the peri-implant site

Affiliations
Review

Radiographic assessment of the peri-implant site

Philipp Sahrmann et al. Periodontol 2000. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

While peri-implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri-implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri-implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow-up assessments. Standardization by custom-made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri-implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri-implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri-implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri-implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri-implant issues.

Keywords: cone beam computed tomography; diagnosis; peri‐implantitis; radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S286‐S291.
    1. Herrera D, Berglundh T, Schwarz F, et al. Prevention and treatment of peri‐implant diseases‐the efp s3 level clinical practice guideline. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(Suppl 26):4‐76.
    1. Gasser TJW, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Interproximal contact loss at implant sites: a retrospective clinical study with a 10‐year follow‐up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(5):482‐491.
    1. Sheba M, Floriani F, Nimmo A, Ercoli C, Hosney S. Interproximal contact loss between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Prosthodont. 2023;33:313‐323.
    1. Zitzmann NU. Occlusal load – a factor for implant failure? In: Heitz‐Mayfield LJA, Salvi GE, eds. Iti Treatment Guide Volume 13 Prevention and Management of Peri‐Implant Diseases. Quintessence Publishing; 2002.

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources