Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 17:5:1348104.
doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1348104. eCollection 2024.

The effects of diabetes self-management programs on clinical and patient reported outcomes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

The effects of diabetes self-management programs on clinical and patient reported outcomes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Paige Alliston et al. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. .

Abstract

Objectives: With diabetes self-management continuing to become more complex for older adults, self-management programs have been shown to support this population in meeting their multifaceted medical needs. Building on our previous systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to update the literature on the effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs and investigate the impact of specific self-management interventions on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: We updated our literature search in the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Database of Randomized Controlled Trials from November 2013 to July 2023 for studies that may fit our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from the included group of studies.

Results: A total of 17 studies with 21 comparison arms met the inclusion criteria, totalling 5976 older adults (3510 individuals randomized to self-management programming and 2466 to usual care). The pooled effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs in older adults on glycemic control (hemoglobin A1C) was a reduction of -0.32 (95% CI -0.44, -0.19). Specifically, the most effective approach on glycemic control (A1C) was the use of feedback (-0.52%; 95% CI -0.68, -0.36). Overall, self-management programs improved behaviour change outcomes, with feedback interventions being most effective (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.91; 95% CI 0.39, 1.43). The effect of self-management programs on body mass index, weight and lipids were statistically and clinically significant.

Conclusions: The evidence for diabetes self-management programs for older adults demonstrates a small but clinically meaningful reduction in A1C, improvement in patient-reported outcomes (behaviour, self-efficacy, knowledge), and other clinical outcomes (BMI, weight and lipids). The specific strategy used in diabetes self-management programs for older adults should be considered to achieve optimal results on outcomes.

Keywords: diabetes; meta-analysis; older adults; self-management; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram and selection, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The pooled treatment effect of diabetes self-management program in older adults on glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The pooled treatment effect of diabetes self-management programs in older adults on fasting blood glucose (mmol/L).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The pooled treatment effect of diabetes self-management programs in older adults on body mass index (BMI).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The pooled treatment effect of diabetes self-management programs in older adults on weight (kg).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The pooled treatment effect of diabetes self-management programs in older adults on patient-reported outcomes, specifically behaviour change, diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy. IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire; SCI-R, Self-Care Inventory-R; HEI, Healthy Eating Index; T2D-SCS, Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care Scale; DSMI-SF, Diabetes Self-Management Instrument Short Form; PDMS, Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale; SDSCA, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities; SDSCA-GDC, Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities-Diet; SDSCA-EX, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities-Exercise; SDSCA-SMBG, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities-Self Monitoring Blood Glucose; MARS-5, Medication Adherence Report Scale; MMAS, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale; DKN-A, Diabetes Knowledge Scale; RMDKQ, Revised Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire; DMSE, Diabetes Self-Management Instrument; LSES, Lorig Self-efficacy Scale.

References

    1. Sinclair A, Saeedi P, Kaundal A, Karuranga S, Malanda B, Williams R. Diabetes and global ageing among 65-99-year-old adults: Findings from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. (2020) 162. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinclair A, Dunning T, Rodriguez-Mañas L. Diabetes in older people: new insights and remaining challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2015) 3:275–85. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70176-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abd Ghafar MZA, O’Donovan M, Sezgin D, Moloney E, Rodríguez-Laso Á, Liew A, et al. . Frailty and diabetes in older adults: Overview of current controversies and challenges in clinical practice. Front. Clin. Diabetes Healthc. (2022) 3:895313. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.895313 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li TJ, Zhou J, Ma JJ, Luo HY, Ye XM. What are the self-management experiences of the elderly with diabetes? A systematic review of qualitative research. World J. Clin. Cases. (2022) 10:1226–41. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1226 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atif M, Saleem Q, Babar ZU, Scahill S. Association between the vicious cycle of diabetes-associated complications and glycemic control among the elderly: A systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). (2018) 54. doi: 10.3390/medicina54050073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources