A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews
- PMID: 38954675
- PMCID: PMC11218965
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305008
A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). A clearer understanding of the impact of these roles will inform global priorities for advanced practice nursing education, research, and policy.
Objective: To identify gaps in advanced practice nursing research globally.
Materials and methods: A review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Healthstar, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, DARE, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and Web of Science from January 2011 onwards, with no restrictions on jurisdiction or language. Grey literature and hand searches of reference lists were undertaken. Review quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Study selection, data extraction and CASP assessments were done independently by two reviewers. We extracted study characteristics, country and outcome data. Data were summarized using narrative synthesis.
Results: We screened 5840 articles and retained 117 systematic reviews, representing 38 countries. Most CASP criteria were met. However, study selection by two reviewers was done inconsistently and language and geographical restrictions were applied. We found highly consistent evidence that APN, NP and CNS care was equal or superior to the comparator (e.g., physicians) for 29 indicator categories across a wide range of clinical settings, patient populations and acuity levels. Mixed findings were noted for quality of life, consultations, costs, emergency room visits, and health care service delivery where some studies favoured the control groups. No indicator consistently favoured the control group. There is emerging research related to Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Conclusion: There is a large body of advanced practice nursing research globally, but several WHO regions are underrepresented. Identified research gaps include AI, interprofessional team functioning, workload, and patients and families as partners in healthcare.
Prospero registration number: CRD42021278532.
Copyright: © 2024 Kilpatrick et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



References
-
- World Health Organization. State of the World’s Nursing Report 2020- Investing in education, jobs and leadership. Health Workforce. 6 April 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279.
-
- National Academies of Sciences and Medicine. The future of nursing 2020–2030: Charting a path to achieve health equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573914/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK573914.pdf. - PubMed
-
- International Council of Nurses, Schober M, Lehwaldt D, Rogers M, Steinke M, Turale S, et al.. Guidelines on advanced practice nursing. 2020. Available from: https://www.icn.ch/system/files/documents/2020-04/ICN_APN%20Report_EN_WE....
-
- Canadian Nurses Association, Almost J. Regulated nursing in Canada: The Landscape in 2021. February 2021. Available from: https://www.cna-aiic.ca/en/nursing-practice/the-practice-of-nursing/regu....
-
- American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). Discussion Paper: Quality of nurse practitioner practice. 2020. Available from: https://storage.aanp.org/www/documents/advocacy/position-papers/Quality-....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous