Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;41(11):2979-2985.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03175-w. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

The effects of age, mature oocyte number, and cycle number on cumulative live birth rates after planned oocyte cryopreservation

Affiliations

The effects of age, mature oocyte number, and cycle number on cumulative live birth rates after planned oocyte cryopreservation

Sarah Druckenmiller Cascante et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effects of age, mature oocyte number, and cycle number on cumulative live birth rates after planned oocyte cryopreservation (OC), with the goal of developing a patient counselling tool.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with ≥ 1 autologous oocyte thaw at our university-affiliated fertility center before 12/31/2023. Patients were included if they (1) had a live birth or ongoing pregnancy > 12 weeks from OC, or (2) used all oocytes and euploid/untested embryos from OC. Primary outcome was cumulative live birth / ongoing pregnancy rate (CLBR).

Results: 527 patients with 1 OC cycle, 149 patients with 2 OC cycles, and 55 patients with ≥ 3 OC cycles were included. Overall CLBR was 43%. CLBR was > 70% among patients who thawed ≥ 20 mature oocytes that were cryopreserved at age < 38 years. Multiple logistic regression showed that age at first OC and total number of mature oocytes thawed independently predicted CLBR, but number of OC cycles did not.

Conclusion: Patients must be counselled that younger age at OC and more mature oocytes improve CLBR. However, additional OC cycles do not independently improve CLBR. Our results can help patients decide whether to pursue additional OC cycles to obtain more oocytes.

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; Egg freezing; Egg thaw; Fertility preservation; Oocyte cryopreservation; Oocyte thaw.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative live birth / ongoing pregnancy rates (CLBRs) per patient based on age at first oocyte cryopreservation (OC)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative live birth / ongoing pregnancy rates (CLBRs) per patient based on total number of metaphase II oocytes (M2s) thawed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multiple logistic regression model for cumulative live birth / ongoing pregnancy rate (CLBR) based on age at first cryopreservation and total number of metaphase II oocytes (M2s) thawed

References

    1. Cascante SD, Blakemore JK, DeVore S, Hodes-Wertz B, Fino ME, Berkeley AS, et al. Fifteen years of autologous oocyte thaw outcomes from a large university-based fertility center. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:158–66. - PubMed
    1. Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:769–76. - PubMed
    1. Grifo JA, Noyes N. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:391–6. - PubMed
    1. Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, Mullin C, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:118–23. - PubMed
    1. Goldman KN, Noyes NL, Knopman JM, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis? Fertil Steril. 2013;100:712–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources