Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;52(8):1928-1940.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01601-z. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

Reduced benefit from long-term item frequency contributes to short-term memory deficits in dyslexia

Affiliations

Reduced benefit from long-term item frequency contributes to short-term memory deficits in dyslexia

Eva Kimel et al. Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Dyslexia, a specific difficulty in acquiring proficient reading, is also characterized by reduced short-term memory (STM) capacity. Extensive research indicates that individuals with developmental dyslexia (IDDs) benefit less from exposure, and this hampers their long-term knowledge accumulation. It is well established that long-term knowledge has a great effect on performance in STM tasks, and thus IDDs' reduced benefit of exposure could potentially reduce their relative performance in such tasks, especially when frequent items, such as digit-words, are used. In this study we used a standard, widely used, STM assessment: the Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The task was conducted twice: in native language and in second language. As exposure to native language is greater than exposure to second language, we predicted that IDDs' performance in the task administered in native language will reveal a larger group difference as compared to second language, due to IDDs' reduced benefit of item frequency. The prediction was confirmed, in line with the hypothesis that reduced STM in dyslexia to a large extent reflects reduced benefits from long-term item frequency and not a reduced STM per se.

Keywords: Dyslexia; Individual differences; Item frequency; Long-term memory; Short-term memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: The Hebrew University's ethics' Review Board, The Institutional Committee for the Use of Human Subjects in Research, approved this study. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An illustration of the performance in the Digit Span task as an example of a task that benefits from exposure to its comprising items. Performance increases with every exposure, and thus it is better in the high-exposure vs. low-exposure condition. Individuals with developmental dyslexia’s (IDD) performance is reduced as compared to that of non-IDDs, and although their absolute performance improves, their relative difficulty increases with exposure. Adapted with permission from Kimel et al. (2022), made available by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A. Left: Digit Span Scores of Hebrew-speaking controls (blue squares) and individuals with developmental dyslexia (IDDs) (red circles) tested in Hebrew. Right: Scores of English-speaking controls (green triangles), Hebrew-speaking controls (blue squares), and IDDs (red circles) tested in English. B. Difference in scores between English and Hebrew, measuring the benefit of frequency/exposure for digit-words. Hebrew-speaking controls benefit more than Hebrew-speaking IDDs from performing the span in Hebrew, their native language. Although Hebrew-speaking IDDs’ raw scores are the same in English and Hebrew, it might still reflect a benefit in Hebrew, in which digit-words are longer than digit-words in English. C. A scatter plot of Digit Span scores in English vs. scores in Hebrew. Scores of Hebrew-speaking IDDs are highly correlated (Pearson: r = .60, p < .001; red line), whereas those of Hebrew-speaking controls are not (Pearson: r = .25, p = .179). Symbols denote individual scores. Error bars denote one SEM. The values are slightly jittered for display purposes

References

    1. Ahissar, M. (2007). Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(11), 458–465. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.015 - PubMed
    1. Ahissar, M., Lubin, Y., Putter-Katz, H., & Banai, K. (2006). Dyslexia and the failure to form a perceptual anchor. Nature Neuroscience,9(12), 1558–1564. 10.1038/nn1800 - PubMed
    1. Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language,55(1), 64–88. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.002
    1. Artuso, C., Borgatti, R., & Palladino, P. (2021). Phonological memory updating and developmental dyslexia: The role of long-term knowledge. Child Neuropsychology,27(6), 718–733. 10.1080/09297049.2021.1888907 - PubMed
    1. Artuso, C., & Palladino, P. (2018). How sublexical association strength modulates updating: Cognitive and strategic effects. Memory & Cognition,46(2), 285–297. 10.3758/s13421-017-0764-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources