Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15202.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66222-7.

Development and validation of an intraoperative hypothermia nomograph model for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a retrospective study

Fuhai Xia #  1 , Qiang Li #  2 , Liqin Xu  1 , Xi Chen  1 , Gen Li  1 , Li Li  1 , Zhineng Cheng  1 , Jie Zhang  1 , Chaoliang Deng  1 , Jing Li  1 , Rui Chen #  3
Affiliations

Development and validation of an intraoperative hypothermia nomograph model for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a retrospective study

Fuhai Xia et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and internally validate a nomogram model for assessing the risk of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy. This study is a retrospective study. A total of 530 patients who undergoing VATS lobectomy from January 2022 to December 2023 in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan were selected. Patients were divided into hypothermia group (n = 346) and non-hypothermia group (n = 184) according to whether hypothermia occurred during the operation. Lasso regression was used to screen the independent variables. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of hypothermia during operation, and a nomogram model was established. Bootstrap method was used to internally verify the nomogram model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the model. Calibration curve and Hosmer Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the accuracy of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the model. Intraoperative hypothermia occurred in 346 of 530 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (65.28%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, serum total bilirubin, inhaled desflurane, anesthesia duration, intraoperative infusion volume, intraoperative blood loss and body mass index were risk factors for intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (P < 0.05). The area under ROC curve was 0.757, 95% CI (0.714-0.799). The optimal cutoff value was 0.635, the sensitivity was 0.717, and the specificity was 0.658. These results suggested that the model was well discriminated. Calibration curve has shown that the actual values are generally in agreement with the predicted values. Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that χ2 = 5.588, P = 0.693, indicating that the model has a good accuracy. The DCA results confirmed that the model had high clinical utility. The nomogram model constructed in this study showed good discrimination, accuracy and clinical utility in predicting patients with intraoperative hypothermia, which can provide reference for medical staff to screen high-risk of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.

Keywords: Intraoperative hypothermia; Nomogram; Prediction model; Risk factors; Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LASSO coefficient profiles of intraoperative hypothermia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Tenfold cross-cross validation fitting profiles.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A nomogram model of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristic curve of prediction model.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Calibration curve of prediction model.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Decision curve analysis of prediction model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qing N, Ma HX, Jin GF, et al. Annual progress of the 2022 lung cancer epidemiology study. Chin. Med. J. 2023;103(14):1068–1073. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221213-02640. - DOI
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. 2021 global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li Y, Liang H, Feng Y. Prevalence and multivariable factors associated with inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A single-center retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0953-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berfield KS, Farjah F, Mulligan MS. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019;107(2):603–609. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ezer N, Kale M, Sigel K, et al. Outcomes after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer in older adults. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018;15(1):76–82. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-980OC. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types