Research on commercial milk formulas for young children: A scoping review
- PMID: 38956436
- PMCID: PMC11574680
- DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13675
Research on commercial milk formulas for young children: A scoping review
Abstract
A scoping review of publications about commercial milk formulas intended for or consumed by children 12-36 months (CMF 12-36) was conducted. This review aimed to comprehensively map the existing literature, identify key concepts in the field and understand its evolution through time. A total of 3329 articles were screened and 220 were included, published between 1986 and 2024. Most works were published after 2016 (70.0%) and in high-income countries (71.8%). Original studies were the vast majority (81.8%) of publications. Most publications dealt with feeding practices or analysed the composition and/or contamination of specific products (44.1% and 35.9%), but since the late 2000s, publications about marketing, policy, legislation, and consumer perception started to appear. Most published works (65.5%) did not focus exclusively on CMF 12-36 and included formulas for other demographics or other foods. About half of the works (55.5%) did not consider CMF 12-36 to be a breast milk substitute. We found 81 distinct product denominations used to refer to CMF 12-36, Growing Up Milk was the most common (25.9%). CMF industry was involved in 41.8% of all analysed works, and industry participation and funding were not always clearly informed (22.5% lacked a conflict of interest statement, and 25.5% did not present any information about funding). In the last decade, publications about CMF 12-36 have increased in volume and diversified in scope and subject matter. CMF-industry participation has always been and still is present in the field, so possible vested interests should be taken into account when appreciating the literature.
Keywords: baby formula; child; complementary feeding; conflict of interest; food industry; preschool; toddler milk; young child formula.
© 2024 The Author(s). Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Abe, F. , Miyauchi, H. , Uchijima, A. , Yaeshima, T. , & Iwatsuki, K. (2009). Stability of bifidobacteria in powdered formula. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 44(4), 718–724.
-
- De Abreu, J. , López, E. , & Dini, E. (2009). Osmolality of products and formulas for nutritional therapy. Investigacion Clinica, 50(4), 433–445. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77949765718&partnerI... - PubMed
-
- Aggett, P. J. , Haschke, F. , Heine, W. , Hernell, O. , Launiala, K. , Rey, J. , Rubino, A. , Schoch, G. , Senterre, J. , & Tormo, R. (1990). Comment on the composition of cow's milk based follow‐up formulas. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 79(2), 250–254. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0025231404&partnerID... - PubMed
-
- Akkermans, M. D. , Eussen, S. , van der Horst‐Graat, J. M. , van Elburg, R. M. , van Goudoever, J. B. , & Brus, F. (2017). More ways to successfully supplement vitamin D reply. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105(6), 1564–1566. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
