Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey
- PMID: 38956742
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17891
Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey
Abstract
Objective: To identify current practices in the management of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: International.
Population: Clinicians involved in the management of MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR.
Methods: A structured, self-administered survey.
Main outcome measures: Clinical practices and attitudes to diagnostic criteria and management strategies.
Results: Overall, 62.8% (113/180) of clinicians completed the survey; of which, 66.4% (75/113) of the respondents reported that they would use an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of <10th centile for the smaller twin and an inter-twin EFW discordance of >25% for the diagnosis of sFGR. For early-onset type I sFGR, 79.8% (75/94) of respondents expressed that expectant management would be their routine practice. On the other hand, for early-onset type II and type III sFGR, 19.3% (17/88) and 35.7% (30/84) of respondents would manage these pregnancies expectantly, whereas 71.6% (63/88) and 57.1% (48/84) would refer these pregnancies to a fetal intervention centre or would offer fetal intervention for type II and type III cases, respectively. Moreover, 39.0% (16/41) of the respondents would consider fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for early-onset type I sFGR, whereas 41.5% (17/41) would offer either FLS or selective feticide, and 12.2% (5/41) would exclusively offer selective feticide. For early-onset type II and type III sFGR cases, 25.9% (21/81) and 31.4% (22/70) would exclusively offer FLS, respectively, whereas 33.3% (27/81) and 32.9% (23/70) would exclusively offer selective feticide.
Conclusions: There is significant variation in clinician practices and attitudes towards the management of early-onset sFGR in MCDA twin pregnancies, especially for type II and type III cases, highlighting the need for high-level evidence to guide management.
Keywords: clinical trial; cord occlusion; definition; diagnosis; fetal growth restriction; feticide; fetoscopic laser surgery; intervention; intrauterine demise; morbidity; mortality; multiple; neonatal; pregnancy; prognosis; small for gestational age; stillbirth; surgery; survey.
© 2024 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy. BJOG. 2017;124:e1–e45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.14188
-
- ISUOG. Role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy [Internet] [cited 2023 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.isuog.org/resource/role‐of‐ultrasound‐in‐twin‐pregnancy‐pdf....
-
- Khalil A, Beune I, Hecher K, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W, Reed K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):47–54.
-
- Curado J, Sileo F, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Early‐ and late‐onset selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: natural history and diagnostic criteria. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(5):661–666.
-
- Bennasar M, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, Gratacós E. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(6):376–382.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
