Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Jun;46(6):1282-6.

Comparison of three suture techniques for anastomosis of the small intestine in the horse

  • PMID: 3896066
Free article
Comparative Study

Comparison of three suture techniques for anastomosis of the small intestine in the horse

P W Dean et al. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Seven horses were used to compare the Gambee, the crushing, and a 2-layer inverting suture pattern composed of a simple continuous layer in the mucosa oversewn with a continuous Lembert pattern in the seromuscular layer. Horses were evaluated at 30 days for adhesion formation, lumen diameter, and quality of healing at the anastomotic sites. One horse was euthanatized 9 days after surgery after 24 hours of ileus and colic; necropsy revealed septic peritonitis and widespread adhesions. One horse had no adhesions. The remaining horses had adhesions associated with 50% of the Gambee and 50% of the crushing anastomoses. There were no adhesions related to the 2-layer inverting techniques in these 6 horses. There was no significant difference in percentage reduction of lumen diameters between the 3 techniques, and there was no evidence of chronic obstruction resulting from any of the anastomotic techniques. Histologically, the inflammatory response and fibrosis were minimal in the single layer patterns, but there was increased fibrosis and suture tract inflammation in the 2-layer inverting technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources