Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;35(9):1487-1496.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07162-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk

John A Kanis et al. Osteoporos Int. 2024 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Task Force on 'Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk' commissioned by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee has recommended that FRAX® models in the US do not include adjustment for race and ethnicity. This position paper finds that an agnostic model would unfairly discriminate against the Black, Asian and Hispanic communities and recommends the retention of ethnic and race-specific FRAX models for the US, preferably with updated data on fracture and death hazards. In contrast, the use of intervention thresholds based on a fixed bone mineral density unfairly discriminates against the Black, Asian and Hispanic communities in the US. This position of the Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) is endorsed both by the IOF and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Keywords: FRAX adjustment; Fracture probability; Race and ethnicity; Racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Burnett-Bowie S-AM, Wright NC, Yu EW, Langsetmo L, Yearwood GMH, Crandall CJ, Leslie WD, Cauley JA (2024) The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on clinical algorithms for fracture risk report. J Bone Miner Res 9:zjae048. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae048 - DOI
    1. Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS (2020) Hidden in plain sight—reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. N Engl J Med 383:874–882 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL, AMA Manual of Style Committee (2021) Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA 326:621–627 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Reid HW, Selvan B, Batch BC, Lee RH (2021) The break in FRAX: equity concerns in estimating fracture risk in racial and ethnic minorities. J Am Geriatr Soc 69:2692–2695 Erratum in: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct 14 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Jain RK, Weiner M, Polley E, Iwamaye A, Huang E, Vokes T (2023) Electronic health records (EHRs) can identify patients at high risk of fracture but require substantial race adjustments to currently available fracture risk calculators. J Gen Intern Med 38:3451–3459 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources