Exploring the Telephone Call Experience of Patients with Non-English Language Preference in Primary Care vs. Specialty
- PMID: 38961015
- PMCID: PMC11534924
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08895-4
Exploring the Telephone Call Experience of Patients with Non-English Language Preference in Primary Care vs. Specialty
Abstract
Background: Latine people, comprising 18.5% of the US population, constitute the largest ethnic minority group, with nearly one-third self-identifying as having non-English language preference (NELP). Despite the importance of the telephone in health care access, there is limited understanding of how NELP patients navigate telephone calls with primary and specialty care clinics.
Objective: This qualitative study aims to capture how Spanish speakers with NELP characterize their telephone call experiences with primary and specialty care clinics.
Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 Spanish-speaking participants from primary care clinics with a sizeable proportion of patients who prefer to communicate in a language other than English at an urban academic medical center in Boston, MA.
Participants: Participants were selected from primary care clinics that were well-equipped to serve Spanish-speaking patients. A total of 24 Spanish-speaking patients with NELP, mainly women (83%), with a mean age of 55.8 years, participated. They represented diverse countries of origin, with an average length of time in the USA of 21.7 years.
Approach: Interview questions prompted participants to describe their telephone call experiences with front desk staff, with attention to interpreter availability, ancillary assistance, health outcomes stemming from a lack of language services, and emotional consequences of language discordance on calls.
Key results: Patients perceived primary care clinics as providing familiarity and language concordance during telephone interactions, contrasting with specialty care clinics, seen as sources of monolingual English communication. Participants utilized various strategies, such as requesting interpreters, using concise English phrases, or seeking assistance from acquaintances, relatives, or primary care clinic staff, to mitigate language barriers.
Conclusions: The findings underscore significant challenges faced by Spanish-speaking patients with NELP in ambulatory specialty care telephone calls. The study emphasizes the importance of creating inclusive multilingual telephone environments, standardizing interpreter access, and reflecting the diversity of the communities served.
Keywords: language access; limited english proficiency; non-English language preference (NELP); telephone communications.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Challenges to Video Visits for Patients With Non-English Language Preference: A Qualitative Study.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2457477. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57477. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39937480 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
"Interpreters don't tell you everything": experiences with medical interpretation among Latino cancer patients and caregivers with limited English proficiency.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 18;33(7):595. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09657-6. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40533581
-
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27536798
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Espinoza J, Derrington S. How should clinicians respond to language barriers that exacerbate health inequity? AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(2):E109-116. 10.1001/amajethics.2021.109. - PubMed
-
- Federici FM. Translating health risks: language as a social determinant of health. In: Federici FM, editor. Language as a social determinant of health. Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting. Springer International Publishing; 2022:1–35. 10.1007/978-3-030-87817-7_1.
-
- Showstack R, Santos MG, Feuerherm E, Jacobson H, Martínez G. Language as a Social Determinant of Health. 2019. https://www.aaal.org/news/language-as-a-social-determinant-of-health-an-.... Accessed 24 Jan 2023.
-
- United States Census Bureau. United States Census Quick Facts. United States Department of Commerce. Published 2020. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/RHI725219. Accessed 24 Jan 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous