The effect of classroom size and ceiling height on college students' learning performance using virtual reality technology
- PMID: 38961227
- PMCID: PMC11222537
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65754-2
The effect of classroom size and ceiling height on college students' learning performance using virtual reality technology
Abstract
The physical characteristics of classrooms can significantly impact the physical and mental health as well as the learning performance of college students. This study investigates the effects of classroom size and ceiling height on learning performance using virtual reality technology. Four classroom settings were created: two small classrooms (40.5 m2) with ceiling heights of 3.0 m and 3.9 m, and two large classrooms (62.1 m2) with ceiling heights of 3.9 m and 4.8 m. 34 students participated in task tests while their subjective evaluations and physiological data were recorded. Results showed higher subjective ratings in larger classrooms with the same ceiling height. Classroom size did not significantly affect task test scores. However, there is a significant difference in Task test scores for ceilings of different heights with the same size classroom. The task test improved by 17.3% in the Big and High Room (BHR) and by 20.1% in the Small and Low Room (SLR). Physiological data revealed significant effects of ceiling height, with HRV-nLF/nHF and EEG-β power increasing by 26.5% and 53.9% in BHR, and by 10.7% and 22.8% in SLR, respectively. This study concludes that classroom size and ceiling height plays a crucial role in learning performance and provides insights for classroom design. It also establishes a framework for future research on the interplay between heart rate variability, EEG, and learning performance.
Keywords: Ceiling hight; EEG; HRV; Learning performance; Room size; VR.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures














Similar articles
-
Effects of Classroom Design on the Memory of University Students: From a Gender Perspective.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;18(17):9391. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179391. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34501981 Free PMC article.
-
An integration of expectation confirmation model and information systems success model to explore the factors affecting the continuous intention to utilise virtual classrooms.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69401-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39122921 Free PMC article.
-
Teaching and Curriculum of the Preschool Physical Education Major Direction in Colleges and Universities under Virtual Reality Technology.Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 9;2022:3250986. doi: 10.1155/2022/3250986. eCollection 2022. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35310594 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;19(3):e1339. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1339. eCollection 2023 Sep. Campbell Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37425620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1994-z. BMC Med Educ. 2020. PMID: 32334594 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Brain and Subjective Responses to Indoor Environments Related to Concentration and Creativity.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 8;24(23):7838. doi: 10.3390/s24237838. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39686375 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ge L, Gao Y, Meng X. Employing the spray system to alleviate the thermal action of air-conditioning in summer. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2024;55:104133. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104133. - DOI
-
- Liu S, Wang J, Meng L, Hu C, Meng X. Location of the phase-change material layer on thermal performance of light-weight walls. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2024;19:127–134. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctac096. - DOI
-
- Wu S, Qiu J. “Reading”, “listening” and sound, light environment. City Built Environ. 2024;2:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s44213-023-00022-z. - DOI
-
- Khan J, Hussain T, Javed MT, Meraj S. Effect of indoor environmental quality on human comfort and performance: A review. Ergon. Improv. Prod.: Proc. HWWE. 2022;2017(2):335–345.
-
- Song Y, Mao F, Liu Q. Human comfort in indoor environment: A review on assessment criteria, data collection and data analysis methods. IEEE Access. 2019;16:45–57.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources