Novel biomarkers to identify complicated course of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy
- PMID: 38961525
- DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14264
Novel biomarkers to identify complicated course of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy
Abstract
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common consequence of intensive chemotherapy in hematological patients. More than 90% of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develop FN, and 5%-10% of them die from subsequent sepsis. FN is very common also in autologous stem cell transplant recipients, but the risk of death is lower than in AML patients. In this review, we discuss biomarkers that have been evaluated for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in hematological patients with FN. In general, novel biomarkers have provided little benefit over traditional inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. The utility of most biomarkers in hematological patients with FN has been evaluated in only a few small studies. Although some of them appear promising, much more data is needed before they can be implemented in the clinical evaluation of FN patients. Currently, close patient follow-up is key to detect complicated course of FN and the need for further interventions such as intensive care unit admission. Scoring systems such as q-SOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) or NEWS (National Early Warning Sign) combined with traditional and/or novel biomarkers may provide added value in the clinical evaluation of FN patients.
Keywords: C‐reactive protein; National Early Warning Sign score; Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; acute myeloid leukemia; autologous stem cell transplantation; biomarker; chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia; procalcitonin.
© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Syrjälä H, Ohtonen P, Kinnunen U, et al. Blood stream infections during chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: treatment cycle matters. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29(10):1211‐1218.
-
- Kolonen A, Sinisalo M, Huttunen R, et al. Bloodstream infections in acute myeloid leukemia patients treated according to the Finnish Leukemia Group AML‐2003 protocol ‐ a prospective nationwide study. Infect Dis (Lond). 2017;49(11‐12):799‐808.
-
- Hämäläinen S, Kuittinen T, Matinlauri I, Nousiainen T, Koivula I, Jantunen E. Neutropenic fever and severe sepsis in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving intensive chemotherapy: causes and consequences. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49(3):495‐501.
-
- Kato H, Fujita H, Akiyama N, et al. Infectious complications in adults undergoing intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in 2001‐2005 using the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group AML201 protocols. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(12):4187‐4198.
-
- Lappalainen M, Hämäläinen S, Romppanen T, et al. Febrile neutropenia in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: outcome in relation to qSOFA score, C‐reactive protein, and blood culture findings. Eur J Haematol. 2020;105(6):731‐740.