Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;43(4):792-801.
doi: 10.1111/ajag.13351. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

Diabetes in residential aged care: Pharmacological management and concordance with clinical guidelines

Hargun Bhalla  1 , Guogui Huang  2 , Karla Seaman  2 , S Sandun Malpriya Silva  2 , Bosco Wu  1 , Nasir Wabe  2 , Johanna I Westbrook  2 , Amy D Nguyen  2   3
Affiliations

Diabetes in residential aged care: Pharmacological management and concordance with clinical guidelines

Hargun Bhalla et al. Australas J Ageing. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Existing studies have highlighted suboptimal diabetes management in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). However, understanding of diabetes management in Australian metropolitan RACFs has been limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the pharmacological management of diabetes in 25 RACFs in Sydney Australia and assess concordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Methods: Data from 231 permanent RACF residents aged ≥65 years and over with type 2 diabetes mellitus over the period from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2019 were used. Concordance was measured by assessing the medications and medical history data for each individual resident for concordance with evidence-based CPGs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of resident characteristics on concordance with CPGs.

Results: Of the 231 residents with diabetes, 87 (38%) were not taking any antidiabetic medication. Pharmacological management inconsistent with CPG recommendations was observed for 73 (32%) residents, with the most common reason for non-concordance being the use of medications with significant adverse effects in older adults (47, 2%). Residents with hypertension or other heart diseases in addition to their diabetes had greater odds of their diabetes management being non-concordant with CPGs (OR = 2.84 95% CI = 1.54, 5.3 and OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.07, 6.41, respectively).

Conclusions: Pharmacological diabetes management in metropolitan Australian RACFs is suboptimal, with a high prevalence of inconsistency with CPGs (32%) observed. Additionally, having hypertension or heart diseases significantly increased the possibility of non-concordance among diabetic RACF residents. Further investigation into the underlying relationships with comorbidities is required to develop better strategies.

Keywords: antihypertensive agents; diabetes mellitus; residential aged care facility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Westman EC. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pathophysiologic perspective. Front Nutr. 2021;8:707371. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.707371 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al KJ. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes – global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(1):107‐111. doi:10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Older Australia at a Glance. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018.
    1. Haines HM, Bannon‐Murphy H, Amos T, Krones R. Prevalence and management of diabetes in residential aged care facilities in north‐east Victoria, Australia. Aust Fam Physician. 2016;45(12):908‐911. - PubMed
    1. Khalil H, Tan L, George J. Diabetes management in Australian rural aged care facilities: a cross–sectional audit. Australas Med J. 2012;5(11):575‐580. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2012.1411 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances