Response to the Letter to the Editor: Lumbar transforaminal injection of steroids versus platelet-rich plasma for prolapse lumbar intervertebral disc with radiculopathy: a randomized double-blind controlled pilot study

Affiliations

¹ Department of Spine Surgery, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Ghaziabad, India.
² Department of Spine Surgery, Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, New Delhi, India.
³ Winnipeg Spine Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
⁴ Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.

Anuj Gupta et al. Asian Spine J. 2024 Jun.

. 2024 Jun;18(3):489-490.

doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0109.r2. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

¹ Department of Spine Surgery, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Ghaziabad, India.
² Department of Spine Surgery, Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, New Delhi, India.
³ Winnipeg Spine Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
⁴ Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.

No abstract available

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

1. Gupta A, Chhabra HS, Singh V, Nagarjuna D. Lumbar transforaminal injection of steroids versus platelet-rich plasma for prolapse lumbar intervertebral disc with radiculopathy: a randomized double-blind controlled pilot study. Asian Spine J. 2024;18:58–65. - PMC - PubMed
1. Snowball R. Using the clinical question to teach search strategy: fostering transferable conceptual skills in user education by active learning. Health Libr Rev. 1997;14:167–72.
1. Eldawlatly A, Alshehri H, Alqahtani A, Ahmad A, Al-Dammas F, Marzouk A. Appearance of Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome as research question in the title of articles of three different anesthesia journals: a pilot study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12:283–6. - PMC - PubMed
1. McCrindle BW. In: Paediatric cardiology. 3rd ed. Anderson RH, Baker EJ, Penny DJ, Redington AN, Rigby ML, Wernovsky G, editors. Philadelphia (PA): Churchill Livingstone; 2010. Description and analysis of data, and critical appraisal of the literature; pp. 437–59.