Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 3;56(10):1549-1560.
doi: 10.3724/abbs.2024106.

CCL2 promotes EGFR-TKIs resistance in non-small cell lung cancer via the AKT-EMT pathway

Affiliations

CCL2 promotes EGFR-TKIs resistance in non-small cell lung cancer via the AKT-EMT pathway

Yunlian Diao et al. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). .

Abstract

Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) represents a primary cause of treatment failure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) is recently found to play a pivotal role in determining anti-cancer treatment response. However, the role and mechanism of CCL2 in the development of EGFR-TKIs resistance have not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we focus on the function of CCL2 in the development of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC cells. Our results show that CCL2 is aberrantly upregulated in EGFR-TKIs-resistant NSCLC cells and that CCL2 overexpression significantly diminishes sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. Conversely, CCL2 suppression by CCL2 synthesis inhibitor, bindarit, or CCL2 knockdown can reverse this resistance. CCL2 upregulation can also lead to enhanced migration and increased expressions of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers in EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cells, which could also be rescued by CCL2 knockdown or inhibition. Furthermore, our findings suggest that CCL2-dependent EGFR-TKIs resistance involves the AKT-EMT signaling pathway; inhibition of this pathway effectively attenuates CCL2-induced cell migration and EMT marker expression. In summary, CCL2 promotes the development of acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance and EMT while activating AKT signaling in NSCLC. These insights suggest a promising avenue for the development of CCL2-targeted therapies that prevent EGFR-TKIs resistance in NSCLC.

Keywords: CCL2; EGFR-TKIs resistance; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; non-small cell lung cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

None
Figure 1
CCL2 is upregulated in NSCLC cells with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs (A) Clustered heatmap of the upregulated ( P-value<0.05 and log2FC≥1) and downregulated genes ( P-value<0.05 and log2FC<1) between gefitinib-resistant (gefi-R) and gefitinib-sensitive (gefi-S) NSCLC cells. (B) KEGG pathway analysis of gefitinib-resistant and gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC samples in the GSE122005 dataset. (C) Volcano plot showing genes that were differentially expressed between gefitinib-resistant and gefitinib-sensitive NSCLC cells. (D,E) Cells were treated with different concentrations of gefitinib or osimertinib for 72 h. CCK-8 assays were used to detect the IC 50 values of gefitinib in HCC827 and HCC827-GR cells (D) and the IC 50 values of osimertinib in HCC827 and HCC827-OR cells (E). (F) qRT-PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of CCL2 in HCC827, HCC827-GR, and HCC827-OR cells. (G) ELISA was performed to detect the protein expressions of CCL2 in HCC827, HCC827-GR, and HCC827-OR cells. Data are shown as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments (*** P<0.001).
None
Figure 2
CCL2 upregulation induces resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC cells (A,B) The viability of HCC827 cells treated with gefitinib (A) and osimertinib (B) was determined by a CCK-8 assay after pretreatment with rhCCL2 (100 ng/mL) or PBS (control) for 120 h. (C‒E) Validation of CCL2 overexpression in HCC827 cells at the mRNA (D) and protein (C,E) levels. (F,G) The viability of gefitinib-(F) and osimertinib-(G) treated HCC827 cells after CCL2 overexpression was determined by CCK-8 assay. Data are shown as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments (** P<0.01, *** P<0.001).
None
Figure 3
CCL2 suppression reverses EGFR-TKIs resistance in vitro (A,B) In the presence or absence of bindarit (300 nM), HCC827 cells were pretreated with rhCCL2 (100 ng/mL) for 120 h, and the sensitivities to gefitinib (A) and osimertinib (B) were tested by CCK-8 assay. (C,D) Viability of HCC827-GR cells treated with gefitinib (C) and HCC827-OR cells treated with osimertinib (D) pretreated with or without bindarit (300 nM) was assayed by CCK-8 assay. (E,F) Validation of CCL2 knockdown in HCC827-GR cells and HCC827-OR cells at the mRNA (E) and protein levels (F). (G,H) The viability of HCC827-GR cells treated with gefitinib (G) and HCC827-OR cells treated with osimertinib (H) was determined by CCK-8 assay after CCL2 knockdown. Data are shown as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001).
None
Figure 4
NSCLC cells with acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance exhibit enhanced migration and EMT (A) Western blot analysis of E-cadherin, Vimentin, N-cadherin, and ZEB1 levels in HCC827, HCC827-GR, and HCC827-OR cells. (B,C) Immunofluorescence assays of E-cadherin (B) and vimentin (C) in HCC827, HCC827-GR, and HCC827-OR cells (original magnification: 630×, scale bar: 25 μm). (D) Transwell assays were performed to detect the migration of HCC827, HCC827-GR, and HCC827-OR cells (scale bar: 5 mm). (E,F) Differences in the proliferation of HCC827 and EGFR-TKIs-resistant HCC827 cells (HCC827-GR cells in B, HCC827-OR cells in C) were determined by CCK-8 assay at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h. Data are shown as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments (ns P>0.05, *** P<0.001).
None
Figure 5
CCL2 upregulation promotes EMT and migration in NSCLC cells (A) Volcano plot showing genes differentially expressed between HCC827-Empty and HCC827-CCL2 cells. (B) GO and KEGG pathway analyses of the differentially enriched pathways. (C) Transwell assays were performed to detect the migration of HCC827-Empty and HCC827-CCL2 cells (scale bar: 100 μm). (D,E) The migration ability of HCC827-GR cells (D) and HCC827-OR cells (E) after CCL2 knockdown was detected by Transwell assay (scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Western blot analysis of ZEB1, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin levels in HCC827-Empty and HCC827-CCL2 cells. (G,H) Immunofluorescence assays of E-cadherin (G) and vimentin (H) in HCC827-Empty and HCC827-CCL2 cells (original magnification: 630×, scale bar: 25 μm). (I) Western blot analysis of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin levels in HCC827-GR and HCC827-OR cells after CCL2 knockdown. Data are shown as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments (* P<0.05, *** P<0.001).
None
Figure 6
CCL2 promotes acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance through AKT-EMT signaling (A) Western blot analysis of p-AKT and AKT levels in HCC827, HCC827-GR and HCC827-OR cells. (B) Western blot analysis of p-AKT and AKT in levels HCC827 cells pretreated with rhCCL2 or rhCCL2 combined with bindarit. (C) Western blot analysis of p-AKT and AKT levels in HCC827-Empty and HCC827-CCL2 cells. (D) Western blot analysis of p-AKT and AKT levels in HCC827-GR and HCC827-OR cells after CCL2 knockdown. (E) The migration ability of HCC827-CCL2 cells treated with LY2940002 (10 μM) was detected by a transwell assay (scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Western blot analysis of p-AKT, AKT, E-cadherin, Vimentin, N-cadherin, and ZEB1 levels in HCC827-CCL2 cells treated with LY2940002 (10 μM). (G) Schematic diagram of CCL2-mediated resistance to EGFR-TKIs by activating the AKT signaling pathway and promoting EMT. Data are shown as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. . 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Devasia T, Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Jemal A, Kramer J, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. . 2022;72:409–436. doi: 10.3322/caac.21731. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu GH, Chen T, Zhang X, Ma XL, Shi HS. Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers. MedComm. . 2022;3:e181. doi: 10.1002/mco2.181. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng Y, Zhang T, Xu Q. Therapeutic advances in non‐small cell lung cancer: focus on clinical development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. MedComm. . 2021;2:692–729. doi: 10.1002/mco2.105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. . 2012;13:239–246. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms