Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 3;12(7):e5947.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005947. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Beyond Mastectomy: The Incidence of Subsequent Aesthetic Procedures after Mastectomy with and without Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations

Beyond Mastectomy: The Incidence of Subsequent Aesthetic Procedures after Mastectomy with and without Breast Reconstruction

Elizabeth S O'Neill et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: Mastectomy poses significant challenges to a woman's body image and psychological well-being, and breast reconstruction plays a pivotal role in postoperative quality of life. Following breast reconstruction, many patients choose to have subsequent aesthetic procedures. Data on the prevalence of such subsequent aesthetic interventions are lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to analyze trends in aesthetic procedures in patients following mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction.

Methods: The PearlDiver database was queried within its capabilities for patients who underwent mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction, and a variety of aesthetic procedures after mastectomy. Aesthetic procedure rates were compared between cohorts.

Results: We identified 365,525 mastectomy patients: 282,815 without reconstruction and 82,710 with reconstruction. In total, 609 patients with reconstruction and 329 without underwent subsequent aesthetic procedures. The rate of aesthetic procedures was higher in the reconstruction group (0.7%) compared with the nonreconstruction group (0.1%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Patients who chose to have breast reconstruction after mastectomy underwent significantly more subsequent aesthetic procedures compared with those who chose mastectomy alone. Our findings provide insights on the prevalence of aesthetic procedures in postmastectomy patients, highlighting the potentially longitudinal nature of the reconstructive and aesthetic journey beyond the index oncologic procedure. Further research is needed to address motivations for such procedures as well as patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Sex breakdown of patients who underwent mastectomy without reconstruction: women (95.14%); men (4.86%); P < 0.001.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Percentages of aesthetic procedures following mastectomy, with (blue) and without (orange) reconstruction.

Similar articles

References

    1. Afshar-Bakshloo M, Albers S, Richter C, et al. . How breast cancer therapies impact body image—real-world data from a prospective cohort study collecting patient-reported outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2023;23:705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkar MA, Mikwar Z, Khalid AA, et al. . Patient satisfaction and quality of life after mastectomy at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah. Cureus. 2023;15:e51029. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zehra S, Doyle F, Barry M, et al. . Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2020;27:534–566. - PubMed
    1. Fracon S, Renzi N, Manara M, et al. . Patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction: implants vs. autologous tissues. Acta Chir Plast. 2018;59:120–128. - PubMed
    1. Sadok N, Krabbe-Timmerman IS, Buisman NH, et al. . Short-term quality of life after autologous compared with alloplastic breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152:55S–68S. - PMC - PubMed