Beyond Mastectomy: The Incidence of Subsequent Aesthetic Procedures after Mastectomy with and without Breast Reconstruction
- PMID: 38962154
- PMCID: PMC11221852
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005947
Beyond Mastectomy: The Incidence of Subsequent Aesthetic Procedures after Mastectomy with and without Breast Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Mastectomy poses significant challenges to a woman's body image and psychological well-being, and breast reconstruction plays a pivotal role in postoperative quality of life. Following breast reconstruction, many patients choose to have subsequent aesthetic procedures. Data on the prevalence of such subsequent aesthetic interventions are lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to analyze trends in aesthetic procedures in patients following mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction.
Methods: The PearlDiver database was queried within its capabilities for patients who underwent mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction, and a variety of aesthetic procedures after mastectomy. Aesthetic procedure rates were compared between cohorts.
Results: We identified 365,525 mastectomy patients: 282,815 without reconstruction and 82,710 with reconstruction. In total, 609 patients with reconstruction and 329 without underwent subsequent aesthetic procedures. The rate of aesthetic procedures was higher in the reconstruction group (0.7%) compared with the nonreconstruction group (0.1%; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients who chose to have breast reconstruction after mastectomy underwent significantly more subsequent aesthetic procedures compared with those who chose mastectomy alone. Our findings provide insights on the prevalence of aesthetic procedures in postmastectomy patients, highlighting the potentially longitudinal nature of the reconstructive and aesthetic journey beyond the index oncologic procedure. Further research is needed to address motivations for such procedures as well as patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Sep;106(4):769-76. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200009040-00003. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. PMID: 11007387
-
Age-dependent Characteristics in Women with Breast Cancer: Mastectomy and Reconstructive Trends at an Urban Academic Institution.Am Surg. 2016 Mar;82(3):227-35. Am Surg. 2016. PMID: 27099059
-
Management of contralateral breast following mastectomy and breast reconstruction using a mirror adjustment with crescent mastopexy technique.Breast Cancer. 2018 Jan;25(1):94-99. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0796-6. Epub 2017 Aug 17. Breast Cancer. 2018. PMID: 28819836
-
Patient-centered outcomes of breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A comprehensive review of the literature.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jun;70(6):768-780. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 28. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017. PMID: 28416138 Review.
-
Advocating for Enhanced Patient Engagement in Breast Cancer Care: Impact of Residual Increased Lateral Adiposity and Consideration of the Pursuit of "Living Flat".Clin Breast Cancer. 2024 Apr;24(3):e186-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Jan 17. Clin Breast Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38326163 Review.
References
-
- Zehra S, Doyle F, Barry M, et al. . Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2020;27:534–566. - PubMed
-
- Fracon S, Renzi N, Manara M, et al. . Patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction: implants vs. autologous tissues. Acta Chir Plast. 2018;59:120–128. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources