Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 2;17(7):e13744.
doi: 10.1111/eva.13744. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Chloroplast DNA methylation in the kelp Saccharina latissima is determined by origin and possibly influenced by cultivation

Affiliations

Chloroplast DNA methylation in the kelp Saccharina latissima is determined by origin and possibly influenced by cultivation

Lydia Scheschonk et al. Evol Appl. .

Abstract

DNA cytosine methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism in genomic DNA. In most land plants, it is absent in the chloroplast DNA. We detected methylation in the chloroplast DNA of the kelp Saccharina latissima, a non-model macroalgal species of high ecological and economic importance. Since the functional role of the chloroplast methylome is yet largely unknown, this fundamental research assessed the chloroplast DNA cytosine methylation in wild and laboratory raised kelp from different climatic origins (High-Arctic at 79° N, and temperate at 54° N), and in laboratory samples from these origins raised at different temperatures (5, 10 and 15°C). Results suggest genome-wide differences in methylated sites and methylation level between the origins, while rearing temperature had only weak effects on the chloroplast methylome. Our findings point at the importance of matching conditions to origin in restoration and cultivation processes to be valid even on plastid level.

Keywords: aquaculture; epigenetics; marine algae; marine macrophyte; non‐model organism; organelle genome methylation; plastid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest were met.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Differences in methylated sites and methylation level between conditions. Methylated CG sites (a, b), and methylation levels as reads per million (RPM) for CHG sites (c, d) between populations and temperatures in laboratory samples (a, c) and compared between origins (b, d). ns, Not significant. Numbers at the bottom of the bars indicate sample size. Significance codes after p‐value correction (Benjamini–Hochberg) for multiple comparisons: ‘<0.05’: *, ‘<0.01’: **, ‘<0.001’: ***, ‘<0.0001’: ****.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Principal component analysis for (a) Laboratory samples of both origins grouped by temperature treatment. (b) Laboratory samples grouped by origin. (c) All samples, grouped by origin. (d) Field samples grouped by origin. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals around the group medians.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
VennEuler diagram showing the numbers of differentially methylated sites between Helgoland and Spitsbergen when analysing field samples (blue), and laboratory samples (orange; Tables S2 and S3). The labels give the product of the genes that were differentially methylated in the respective partitions. (_1) and (_2) depict a gene that showed differential methylation at two different sites. For the exact site position in the respective gene, see Table S6 (‘ST6 Origins’).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Epigenetic distances in the chloroplast and nuclear methylome (‘genome’). The corresponding mantel test showed that the chloroplast methylome did not in general mirror the nuclear methylome (r = 0.145).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Epigenetic distance (Euclidean distance) for ‘cultivation’, Laboratory (orange) and Field (blue) samples (a), and for ‘origin’, Helgoland (yellow) and Spitsbergen (green) samples (b). The small black dots depict the pairwise distances between the individual samples of each. The light grey dots are outliers detected by the boxplot script but were included during epi‐distance analyses. The boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR) of the respective group, and the horizontal line within the boxes gives the median Euclidean distance.

References

    1. Alexa, A. , & Rahnenführer, J. (2009). Gene set enrichment analysis with topGO. Bioconductor Improv, 27, 1–26.
    1. Bartsch, I. , Wiencke, C. , Bischof, K. , Buchholz, C. M. , Buck, B. H. , Eggert, A. , Feuerpfeil, P. , Hanelt, D. , Jacobsen, S. , Karez, R. , Karsten, U. , Molis, M. , Roleda, M. Y. , Schubert, H. , Schumann, R. , Valentin, K. , Weinberger, F. , & Wiese, J. (2008). The genus Laminaria sensu lato: Recent insights and developments. European Journal of Phycology, 43, 1–86. 10.1080/09670260701711376 - DOI
    1. Benjamini, Y. , & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289–300.
    1. Birky, C. (1995). Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: Mechanisms and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92(25), 11331–11338. 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolton, J. J. , & Lüning, K. (1982). Optimal growth and maximal survival temperatures of Atlantic Laminaria species (Phaeophyta) in culture. Marine Biology, 66, 89–94. 10.1007/BF00397259 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources