Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Protocol Improves Pregnancy Outcomes During In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Treatment in Young Infertile Women: A Retrospective Study
- PMID: 38962592
- PMCID: PMC11220438
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61554
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Protocol Improves Pregnancy Outcomes During In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Treatment in Young Infertile Women: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to determine if gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment in young infertile women improve their pregnancy outcomes. Methodology We retrospectively reviewed the records of 876 young infertile women aged 20-35 years who underwent fresh embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles. The data were collected from their initial visits to the reproductive medicine center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2019 and December 2022. We divided them into two groups according to the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols: GnRH-a (n = 580) and GnRH-ant (n = 296). The primary outcome assessed in this study was the live birth rate. The secondary observation indicators included the total dose and duration of gonadotropin (Gn), total embryo transfer, day three (D3) embryo transfer, total two pro-nuclei (2PN) cleavage count, number of fertilizations, and implantation rate. Results The live birth rate had no clinical significance (P > 0.05). The total dose and duration of Gn stimulation in the GnRH-ant group were lower than in the GnRH-a group (P < 0.05). The total embryo transfer, D3 embryo transfer, total cleavage count, total 2PN cleavage count, number of fertilizations, transfer, and mature oocytes in metaphase II (MII) of D3 embryos in the GnRH-a group were higher than those in the GnRH-ant group (P < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of the GnRH-a group were higher than those of the control group. Conclusions The total embryo transfer, D3 embryo transfer, total cleavage count, total 2PN cleavage count, number of fertilizations, transfer and MII of D3 embryos, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a protocol group. The total dosage of Gn and duration of Gn stimulation were lower in the GnRH-ant group than in the GnRH-a group. These findings provide the basis for the selection of the COH protocol in normal Chinese ovarian response patients undergoing IVF/ICSI.
Keywords: female infertility; gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gnrh) agonist; gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gnrh) antagonist; in vitro fertilization (ivf); intracytoplasmic sperm injection (icsi).
Copyright © 2024, Mahmood et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional review committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University issued approval permit number is 2023107,dated 2023.9.21. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
Impact of growth hormone on IVF/ICSI outcomes and endometrial receptivity of patients undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol with fresh embryo transfer: a pilot study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 31;14:1225121. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1225121. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37727454 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes between the depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in normal ovarian responders.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 11;21(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03849-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33975553 Free PMC article.
-
Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023 Dec 14;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/erm.2023.25. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023. PMID: 38095077 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparison of GnRH antagonist fixed protocol and GnRH agonists long protocol in infertile patients with normal ovarian reserve function in their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):245-9. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012. PMID: 22781108 Chinese.
-
Conventional GnRH antagonist protocols versus long GnRH agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08400-z. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35292717 Free PMC article.
References
-
- GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type. Lambalk CB, Banga FR, Huirne JA, et al. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:560–579. - PubMed
-
- Pregnancy outcomes after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with endometriosis-associated infertility: GnRH-agonist versus GnRH-antagonist. Kolanska K, Cohen J, Bendifallah S, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46:681–686. - PubMed
-
- GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debate. Orvieto R, Patrizio P. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:4–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources