Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 2;9(4):e1174.
doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001174. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Living well with chronic pain: a 12-month randomized controlled trial revealing impact from the digital pain self-management program EPIO

Lise Solberg Nes  1   2   3 , Elin Børøsund  1   4 , Cecilie Varsi  1   5 , Hilde Eide  1   6 , Lori B Waxenberg  7 , Karen E Weiss  3 , Eleshia J Morrison  3 , Hanne Stavenes Støle  1   8 , Ólöf B Kristjansdottir  1   9   10 , Katrine Bostrøm  1 , Elin Bolle Strand  1   11 , Milada Cvancarova Småstuen Hagen  12 , Audun Stubhaug  2   13   14 , Karlein M G Schreurs  15
Affiliations

Living well with chronic pain: a 12-month randomized controlled trial revealing impact from the digital pain self-management program EPIO

Lise Solberg Nes et al. Pain Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pain affects a wide range of physical and psychological aspects of life for those impacted. Psychosocial treatment approaches may be of support, but outreach is still limited.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of EPIO, an evidence-informed, user-centered digital self-management intervention for people with chronic pain, in a 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Methods: People living with chronic pain (N = 266) were randomized to the EPIO intervention (n = 132) or a usual-care control group (n = 134). The intervention was delivered in a simple blended care model, and outcome measures collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Generalized linear models for repeated measures were fitted to compare groups over time.

Results: Participants were primarily female (81%), median age 49 years (range 22-78), with heterogeneous pain conditions, and had lived with pain >5 years (77.6%). A mixed linear model with all timepoints included revealed no statistically significant group differences for the primary outcome of pain interference. Significant psychological benefits in favor of the intervention group were however detected for depression (P = 0.022), self-regulatory fatigue (P = 0.024), vitality (P = 0.016), and mental health (P = 0.047). Baseline to 12-month changes showed additional favorable effects for anxiety (between-group mean differences [MDs] = 0.79, P = 0.047), depression (MD = 1.08, P = 0.004), self-regulatory fatigue (MD = 2.42, P = 0.021), pain catastrophizing (MD = 2.62, P = 0.009), and health-related quality of life.

Conclusions: The EPIO program aims to improve outreach of evidence-based pain self-management interventions. Findings demonstrate how using EPIO can lead to sustainable psychological change, enhancing mental health and health-related quality of life for people suffering from pain, providing a chance to live well with the pain.

Keywords: Acceptance and commitment therapy; Anxiety; Chronic pain; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Depression; Digital pain self-management; Pain interference; Psychosocial self-management; Self-regulatory fatigue; eHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.S.N. is an unpaid board member of the company dHealth AS, aiming to market the EPIO program for commercialization, but has no financial interest in the company. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This study was funded by the Norwegian Research Council (Grant #256574, Principal Investigator L.Solberg Nes). Data sets from this study are, due to the nature of patient sensitive information, not available for public sharing through public archives or repositories. Deidentified data from this study will however be made available in accordance with institutional standards through contacting the corresponding author. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
EPIO program content.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
EPIO program screenshots.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
CONSORT flow diagram describing enrollment, allocation, follow-up for the 12-month EPIO study. Participants not completing outcome measures are referred to as “Nonresponders.”
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aerts JEM, Dam AV. Blended e-Health in cognitive behavioural therapy: usage intensity, attitude and therapeutic alliance in clinical practice. Psychology 2018;09:2422–35.
    1. Amagai S, Pila S, Kaat AJ, Nowinski CJ, Gershon RC. Challenges in participant engagement and retention using mobile health apps: literature review. J Med Internet Res 2022;24:e35120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkinson TM, Halabi S, Bennett AV, Rogak L, Sit L, Li Y, Kaplan E, Basch E; Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Measurement of affective and activity pain interference using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Cancer and Leukemia Group B 70903. Pain Med 2012;13:1417–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74:1252–65. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Tice DM, Vohs KD. The strength model of self-regulation: conclusions from the second decade of willpower research. Perspect Psychol Sci 2018;13:141–5. - PubMed