Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1:14:20-28.
doi: 10.33393/aop.2024.3023. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective

Erik Cattrysse  1 , Jona Van den Broeck  1 , Robin Petroons  1 , Amber Teugels  1 , Aldo Scafoglieri  1 , Emiel van Trijffel  1   2
Affiliations

Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective

Erik Cattrysse et al. Arch Physiother. .

Abstract

Introduction: Worldwide many countries provide direct access in physiotherapy. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy from different perspectives.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases up to September 2022. Studies were included when regarding assessment of at least one of the following perspectives: patient (quality of Life, patient satisfaction, pain, functioning, adverse events), provider (treatment compliance, responsibility, liability, status, prestige, job satisfaction), and society (number of referrals, amount of medical imaging, medication use, number of sessions needed for rehabilitation, and overall costs and cost-effectiveness). Selection and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews were performed. Data extraction and analysis were performed separately for systematic reviews and individual primary studies.

Results: Five systematic reviews as well as 17 primary studies were included. From a patient perspective, no significant effect of direct access was found for pain and a tendency in favour of direct access was found for quality of life, functioning, and well-being. Concerning providers, higher treatment compliance was found in direct access to physiotherapy and decision-making was more accurate. From a societal perspective, significant differences in favour of direct access physiotherapy were found for waiting time, prescribed medication, and medical imaging. In addition, there was a tendency towards lower health care costs.

Conclusions: Emerging evidence suggests that direct access physiotherapy could provide at least equal quality of care for patients and better opportunities for providers and the society on selected outcomes.

Keywords: Direct access; Physiotherapy; Quality of care; Scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1 -
FIGURE 1 -
PRISMA flow chart of the study selection.
FIGURE 2 -
FIGURE 2 -
Risk of bias assessment of included systematic reviews (n = 5).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–2223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B et al. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(9995):743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davenport TE, Sebelski CA. The physical therapist as a diagnostician: how do we, should we, and could we use information about pathology in our practice? Phys Ther. 2011;91(11):1694–1695. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2011.91.11.1694. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams CM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ et al. Low back pain and best practice care: a survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(3):271–277. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.507. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foster NE, Hartvigsen J, Croft PR. Taking responsibility for the early assessment and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal pain: a review and critical analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(1):205. doi: 10.1186/ar3743. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources