Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 19:12:1379326.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1379326. eCollection 2024.

Health beliefs of unmarried adult Saudi individuals toward safe marriage and the role of premarital screening in avoiding consanguinity: a nationwide cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Health beliefs of unmarried adult Saudi individuals toward safe marriage and the role of premarital screening in avoiding consanguinity: a nationwide cross-sectional study

Reem M Alwhaibi et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Premarital screening (PMS) is an essential global measure that seeks to reduce the occurrence of specific genetic disorders and sexually transmitted diseases common in consanguineous marriages. Due to the lack of a nationwide study, this research was designed to comprehend how unmarried individuals perceive the risks and benefits of PMS.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire distributed through different social media platforms, responses from the native adult population (18-49 years) Saudi Arabia was only included in the study. The questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) to assessing seven different constructs including susceptibility, seriousness, benefits-, barriers-, & cues- to action, self-efficacy, and social acceptance. Data frequency was represented by mean and standard deviation; chi-square and t-tests were conducted for the comparison of independent and dependent variables. A multinomial logistic regression was used to predict factors influencing decisions related to PMS.

Results: 1,522 participants completed the survey, mostly 18-25 years old and most of them were women. The majority were single with 85 men and 1,370 women. Most participants (59.6%) believed their parents were related, while 40.5% did not. 122 respondents reported they had to marry within their tribe. Findings revealed significant correlations among all HBM themes, with varying strengths. Notably, a moderate positive relationship was found between the perception of benefits and cues to action, suggesting that enhancing the perceived benefits of PMS could facilitate safe marriage practices. Multinomial regression analysis revealed that demographic factors and health beliefs significantly influence individuals' intentions and behaviors toward PMS and safe marriage.

Conclusion: The study concludes that by identifying and addressing barriers, and promoting positive social acceptance, PMS can significantly contribute to preventing genetic diseases and promoting safe marriage practices, although the cross-sectional design limits the establishment of causal relationships and further research is needed.

Keywords: Saudi Arabia; barriers to action; benefits to action; consanguineous marriage; genetic counseling; premarital screening; safe marriage; susceptibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HBM constructs for different themes included in this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean score of different themes according to age groups, where Theme 1 to Theme 7 correspond sequentially to Perceived susceptibility, Perceived seriousness, Benefits to action, Barriers to action, Cues to action, Self-efficacy, and social acceptance, respectively.

Similar articles

References

    1. Albanghali MA. Prevalence of consanguineous marriage among Saudi citizens of Albaha, a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:3767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043767, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anwar S, Taslem Mourosi J, Arafat Y, Hosen MJ. Genetic and reproductive consequences of consanguineous marriage in Bangladesh. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0241610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241610, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El Goundali K, Chebabe M, Zahra Laamiri F, Hilali A. The determinants of consanguineous marriages among the Arab population: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health. (2022) 51:253–65. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i2.8679, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamamy H. Consanguineous marriages: preconception consultation in primary health care settings. J Community Genet. (2012) 3:185–92. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ben-Omran T, Al Ghanim K, Yavarna T, El Akoum M, Samara M, Chandra P, et al. . Effects of consanguinity in a cohort of subjects with certain genetic disorders in Qatar. Mol Genet Genomic Med. (2020) 8:e1051. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1051, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources